Cited by 24Neurological disorders and treatmentsMotor Control and AdaptationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Using the Accelerometers Integrated in Smartphones to Evaluate Essential Tremor

Senova, Suhan, Querlioz, Damien, Thiriez, Claire, Jedynak, Pierre, Jarraya, Béchir, Palfi, Stéphane·2015·Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background/Aims: Evaluation of tremor constitutes a crucial step from the diagnosis to the initial treatment and follow-up of patients with essential tremor. The severity of tremor can be evaluated using clinical rating scales, accelerometry, or electrophysiology. Clinical scores are subjectively given, may be affected by intra- and interevaluator variations due to different experience, delays between consultations, and subtle changes in tremor severity. Existing medical devices are not routinely used: they are expensive, time-consuming, not easily accessible. We aimed at showing that a smartphone application using the accelerometers embedded in smartphones is effective for quantifying the tremor of patients presenting with essential tremor. Methods: We developed a free iPhone/iPod application, Itremor, and evaluated different parameters on 8 patients receiving deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus: average and maximum accelerations, time above 1 g of acceleration, peak frequency, typical magnitude of tremor, for postural and action tremors, on and off stimulation. Results: We demonstrated good correlations between the parameters measured with Itremor and clinical score in all conditions. Itremor evaluation enabled higher discriminatory power and degree of reproducibility than clinical scores. Conclusion: Itremor can be used for routine objective evaluation of essential tremor, and may facilitate adjustment of the treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000369354

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senova, S., Querlioz, D., Thiriez, C., Jedynak, P., Jarraya, B., & Palfi, S.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
Venue
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
94-101
ISSN
  • 1011-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0372
OpenAlex
W2016795385
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
essential tremor, smartphone accelerometry, tremor quantification, deep brain stimulation, ventral intermediate nucleus, postural tremor, action tremor, clinical rating scales, dominant frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review