Cited by 35Neurological disorders and treatmentsMotor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disorders

Assessment of Head Tremor with Accelerometers Versus Gyroscopic Transducers

Open access
Elble, Rodger J., Hellriegel, Helge, Raethjen, Jan, Deuschl, Günther·2017·Movement Disorders Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background: Accelerometers and gyroscopes are used commonly in the assessment of hand tremor, but their validity in the assessment of head tremor has not been studied. We hypothesized that gyroscopy would be superior to accelerometry because head tremor is rotational motion, and gyroscopes record rotational motion, free of gravitational artifact. We also hypothesized a strong logarithmic relationship between 0 to 4‐point tremor ratings and the transducer measures of tremor amplitude, similar to those previously reported for hand tremor. Methods: Head tremor was recorded for 1 minute in each of the five head positions used in the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale, using a triaxial accelerometer and triaxial gyroscope mounted at the vertex of the head. Mean and maximum 3‐second burst displacement tremor and rotation tremor were computed by spectral analysis. The minimum detectable change for the transducers was estimated using the residual mean squared error from repeated‐measures analysis of variance. Results: Tremor displacement and rotation (T) were logarithmically related to tremor ratings (tremor rating score; TRS): log(T) = α TRS + β, where α ≈ 0.47 for displacement and ≈0.64 for rotation, and β ≈ −1.8 and −1.4. Tremor ratings correlated more strongly with gyroscopy (r = 0.83–0.87) than with accelerometry (r = 0.71–0.75). Minimum detectable change (percent reduction) was approximately 66% of the baseline geometric mean. Conclusions: Gyroscopic transducers are superior to accelerometry for assessment of head tremor. Both measures of head tremor are logarithmically related to tremor ratings. The minimum detectable change of the transducer measures is comparable to those previously reported for hand tremor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mdc3.12379

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is an unmet need for a reliable, adaptable, and generalizable processing framework that can be directly translated to clinical settings for estimation, extraction, and prediction of action tremor with high spectrotemporal resolution.

    “Despite the crucial need for PHT elimination techniques and the numerous research advancements on this topic51–55, including our previous work13,14, there is an unmet need for a reliable, adaptable, and generalizable processing framework that can be directly translated to clinical settings for estimation, extraction, and prediction of action tremor with high spectrotemporal resolution.”

    From PHTNet: Characterization and Deep Mining of Involuntary Pathological Hand Tremor using Recurrent Neural Network Models (2020) · cites this paper as [55]

    The citation is attached to the statement about advances in PHT elimination, not directly to the citing authors’ conclusion that a generalizable framework is needed. The cited paper’s Methods and Discussion describe measuring head tremor with accelerometers and gyroscopes; the passages found for elimination techniques and action-tremor processing do not address PHT elimination or the stated framework need. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]1. Giuffrida JP, Riley DE, Maddux BN, Heldman DA. Clinically deploy- able Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment. Mov Disord 2009;24:723-730.
  2. [15]15. Torrence C, Compo GP. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 1998;79:61-78.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elble, R. J., Hellriegel, H., Raethjen, J., & Deuschl, G.
Affiliations
  • SIU Medicine (US)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Corresponding author
Elble, Rodger J.
Venue
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-08
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
205-211
ISSN
2330-1619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2474687114
Cited by
35
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Movement Disorders Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • German Research Council (SFB 855)
  • Spastic Paralysis Research Foundation of Kiwanis International
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
head tremor, essential tremor, accelerometry, gyroscope, rotational motion, minimal detectable change, tremor amplitude, measurement validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review