Cited by 17Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Well-Being Therapy in a Patient with Panic Disorder Who Failed to Respond to Paroxetine and Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Cosci, Fiammetta·2015·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is first line choice to treat panic disorder. Treatment response is 65%. Non-responders are usually those who did not complete the intervention. Next-step strategies in the treatment of patients who failed to complete CBT should be found. Case description: L. is a 64-year-old woman who had two lifetime episodes of panic disorder with agoraphobia comorbid with major depression. The first episode was treated with paroxetine and the second with levosulpiride, in both episodes depressive symptoms and panic attacks disappeared but mild agoraphobia remained. L. asked for the visit because of panic attacks, after the assessment the following diagnoses were formulated: panic disorder with agoraphobia (according to DSM), Health Anxiety and Thanatophobia (according to DCPR). Clonazepam and CBT were prescribed. During the first 3 CBT sessions, a behavioural therapy was administered to reduce avoidance. Thereafter, cognitive restructuring was proposed to reduce panic, Health Anxiety, and Thanatophobia. However, after 2 sessions of cognitive restructuring, L. worsened: she was so engaged in identifying negative automatic thoughts to be always thinking to anxiety and having it. Thus, Well-Being Therapy (WBT) was proposed to increase her general level of well-being. After 6 WBT sessions, L. was improved and became able to run 3 sessions of cognitive restructuring after which she was completely free of symptoms. She maintained this condition at one year follow-up. Comment: WBT should be considered as next-step strategy in the treatment of patients who failed to complete the CBT intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000430789

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cosci, F.
Affiliations
University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Cosci, Fiammetta
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
318-319
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W1650720107
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
well-being therapy, panic disorder, agoraphobia, treatment non-response, cognitive behavioral therapy, cognitive restructuring, health anxiety, fear of death, major depressive disorder, clonazepam, behavior therapy, avoidance, negative automatic thoughts
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Failure, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review