Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Essence of Aging

Vijg, Jan, Kennedy, Brian K.·2016·Gerontology

Abstract

The idea that aging is a purposeful, programmed series of events is intuitively appealing based on its many conserved aspects and the demonstrated feasibility of modifying life span by manipulating single genes or pathways. Yet, the case for a nonadaptive basis of aging is strong and now all but generally accepted in the field. Here, we briefly review why the case for programmed aging is weak, with a focus on the lack of possible evolutionary beneficial effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000439348

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The idea that ageing is a purposeful, programmed series of events that evolved under the direct force of natural selection to cause death has been all but discredited.

    “The idea that ageing is a purposeful, programmed series of events that evolved under the direct force of natural selection to cause death has now been all but discredited12.”

    From Evidence for a limit to human lifespan (2016) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1006/jhev.2001.0515 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/298115a0 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00569695 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2406060 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/hdy.1985.67 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02665.x · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature02936 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2091 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.05.013 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024328 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.280.5365.855 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01903.x · DOI
  13. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397920-9.00003-2 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.296.5576.2141 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.mad.2005.03.021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vijg, J., & Kennedy, B. K.
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
381-385
ISSN
  • 0304-324X
  • 1423-0003
Cited by
33
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review