The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015?
Open accessAbstract
Background: The presence of colorectal adenomas is considered a major risk factor for colorectal cancer development. The implementation of screening colonoscopy programs in the Western world has led to a substantial reduction of colorectal cancer death. Many efforts have been made to reduce the adenoma miss rates by the application of new endoscopic devices and techniques for better adenoma visualization. Summary: This special review gives the readership an overview of current endoscopic innovations that can aid in the increase of the adenoma detection rate (ADR) during colonoscopy. These innovations include the use of devices like EndoCuff® and EndoRings® as well as new technical equipment like third-eye endoscope® and full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE®). Key Message: Technical improvements and newly developed accessories are able to improve the ADR. However, additional costs and a willingness to invest into potentially expensive equipment might be necessary. Investigator-dependent skills remain the backbone in the ADR detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy
Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G., Ho, M. N., O'Brien, M. J., Gottlieb, L. S., Sternberg, S. S., Waye, J. D., Schapiro, M., Bond, J. H., Panish, J. F., et al. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312303292701 · Cited by 4,592
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
Kaminski, M. F., Regula, J., Kraszewska, E., Polkowski, M., Wojciechowska, U., Didkowska, J., Zwierko, M., Rupinski, M., Nowacki, M. P., & Butruk, E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907667 · Cited by 2,010
Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults
Pickhardt, P. J., Choi, J. R., Hwang, I., Butler, J. A., Puckett, M. L., Hildebrandt, H. A., Wong, R. K., Nugent, P. A., Mysliwiec, P. A., & Schindler, W. R. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa031618 · Cited by 1,972
Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal Cancer
Lieberman, D. A., Weiss, D. G., Bond, J. H., Ahnen, D. J., Garewal, H., Harford, W. V., Provenzale, D., Sontag, S., Schnell, T., Durbin, T. E., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007203430301 · Cited by 1,815
Quality indicators for colonoscopy
Rex, D. K., Schoenfeld, P. S., Cohen, J., Pike, I. M., Adler, D. G., Fennerty, M. B., Lieb, J. G., Park, W. G., Rizk, M. K., Sawhney, M. S., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058 · Cited by 1,764
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies
Rex, D., Cutler, C., Lemmel, G., Rahmani, E., Clark, D., Helper, D., Lehman, G., & Mark, D. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2 · Cited by 1,553
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy
Rex, D. K., Schoenfeld, P. S., Cohen, J., Pike, I. M., Adler, D. G., Fennerty, B. M., Lieb, J. G., Park, W. G., Rizk, M. K., Sawhney, M. S., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.385 · Cited by 1,401
Colonoscopic Withdrawal Times and Adenoma Detection during Screening Colonoscopy
Barclay, R. L., Vicari, J. J., Doughty, A. S., Johanson, J. F., & Greenlaw, R. L. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055498 · Cited by 1,313
Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Eddy, D. M. (1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-5-373 · Cited by 1,200
Rex, D. K., Bond, J. H., Winawer, S. J., Levin, T. R., Burt, R. W., Johnson, D. A., Kirk, L. M., Litlin, S., Lieberman, D. A., Waye, J. D., et al. (2002) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(02)04168-0 · Cited by 1,049
Cited by
Wang, P., Berzin, T. M., Glissen Brown, J. R., Bharadwaj, S., Becq, A., Xiao, X., Liu, P., Li, L., Song, Y., Zhang, D., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500 · Cited by 865
Reumkens, A., Rondagh, E. J. A., Bakker, M. C., Winkens, B., Masclee, A. A. M., & Sanduleanu, S. (2016) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.234 · Cited by 373
Kaminski, M. F., Thomas‐Gibson, S., Bugajski, M., Bretthauer, M., Rees, C. J., Dekker, E., Hoff, G., Jover, R., Suchanek, S., Ferlitsch, M., et al. (2017) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1177/2050640617700014 · Cited by 346
Study on detection rate of polyps and adenomas in artificial-intelligence-aided colonoscopy
Huang, J., Liu, W.-N., Zhang, Y.-Y., Bian, X.-Q., Wang, L.-J., Yang, Q., & Zhang, X.-D. (2020) · Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.4103/sjg.sjg_377_19 · Cited by 179
Comprehensive Assessment of Diet Quality and Risk of Precursors of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Zheng, X., Hur, J., Nguyen, L. H., Liu, J., Song, M., Wu, K., Smith-Warner, S. A., Ogino, S., Willett, W. C., Chan, A. T., et al. (2021) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa164 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Floer, M., & Meister, T.
- Venue
- Digestion
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 202-213
- ISSN
- 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9867
- OpenAlex
- W2297736292
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 21.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000442464
- The paper
- Floer, M., & Meister, T. (2016). Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015? Digestion. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442464
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
