Biophysically Motivated Regulatory Network Inference: Progress and Prospects
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Thanks to the confluence of genomic technology and computational developments, the possibility of network inference methods that automatically learn large comprehensive models of cellular regulation is closer than ever. This perspective focuses on enumerating the elements of computational strategies that, when coupled to appropriate experimental designs, can lead to accurate large-scale models of chromatin state and transcriptional regulatory structure and dynamics. We highlight 4 research questions that require further investigation in order to make progress in network inference: (1) using overall constraints on network structure such as sparsity, (2) use of informative priors and data integration to constrain individual model parameters, (3) estimation of latent regulatory factor activity under varying cell conditions, and (4) new methods for learning and modeling regulatory factor interactions. We conclude that methods combining advances in these 4 categories of required effort with new genomic technologies will result in biophysically motivated dynamic genome-wide regulatory network models for several of the best-studied organisms and cell types.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues
The FANTOM Consortium, Andersson, R., Gebhard, C., Miguel-Escalada, I., Hoof, I., Bornholdt, J., Boyd, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Schmidl, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12787 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
Inferring Regulatory Networks from Expression Data Using Tree-Based Methods
Huynh-Thu, V. A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012776 · Cited by 2,131 · see citing works
Dynamic regulatory network controlling TH17 cell differentiation
Yosef, N., Shalek, A. K., Gaublomme, J. T., Jin, H., Lee, Y., Awasthi, A., Wu, C., Karwacz, K., Xiao, S., Jorgolli, M., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11981 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Defining mechanisms that regulate RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo
Fuda, N. J., Ardehali, M. B., & Lis, J. T. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08449 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Comparison of co-expression measures: mutual information, correlation, and model based indices
Song, L., Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-328 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Salgado, H. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj156 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Global analysis of cellular protein translation by pulsed SILAC
Schwanhäusser, B., Gossen, M., Dittmar, G., & Selbach, M. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800275 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Functional footprinting of regulatory DNA
Vierstra, J., Reik, A., Chang, K.-H., Stehling-Sun, S., Zhou, Y., Hinkley, S. J., Paschon, D. E., Zhang, L., Psatha, N., Bendana, Y. R., et al. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3554 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Äijö, T., & Bonneau, R.
- Affiliations
- Simons Foundation (US)
- Venue
- Human Heredity
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 62-77
- ISSN
- 0001-5652 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0062
- OpenAlex
- W2949681703
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2024: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Heredity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- regulatory network inference, transcriptional regulation, chromatin state, sparsity constraints, informative priors, data integration, biophysical model, experimental design
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Models, Genetic, Statistics as Topic, Transcription Factors, Genomics, Gene Regulatory Networks, Biophysical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review