Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 571

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pedunculopontine Nucleus Region Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Surgical Anatomy and Terminology

Open access
Hamani, Clement, Aziz, Tipu, Bloem, Bastiaan R., Brown, Peter, Chabardes, Stephan, Coyne, Terry, Foote, Kelly, Garcia-Rill, Edgar, Hirsch, Etienne C., Lozano, Andres M., Mazzone, Paolo A.M., Okun, Michael S., Hutchison, William, Silburn, Peter, Zrinzo, Ludvic, Alam, Mesbah, Goetz, Laurent, Pereira, Erlick, Rughani, Anand, Thevathasan, Wesley, Moro, Elena, Krauss, Joachim K.·2016·Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Abstract

Several lines of evidence over the last few years have been important in ascertaining that the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) region could be considered as a potential target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat freezing and other problems as part of a spectrum of gait disorders in Parkinson disease and other akinetic movement disorders. Since the introduction of PPN DBS, a variety of clinical studies have been published. Most indicate improvements in freezing and falls in patients who are severely affected by these problems. The results across patients, however, have been variable, perhaps reflecting patient selection, heterogeneity in target selection and differences in surgical methodology and stimulation settings. Here we outline both the accumulated knowledge and the domains of uncertainty in surgical anatomy and terminology. Specific topics were assigned to groups of experts, and this work was accumulated and reviewed by the executive committee of the working group. Areas of disagreement were discussed and modified accordingly until a consensus could be reached. We demonstrate that both the anatomy and the functional role of the PPN region need further study. The borders of the PPN and of adjacent nuclei differ when different brainstem atlases and atlas slices are compared. It is difficult to delineate precisely the PPN pars dissipata from the nucleus cuneiformis, as these structures partially overlap. This lack of clarity contributes to the difficulty in targeting and determining the exact localization of the electrodes implanted in patients with akinetic gait disorders. Future clinical studies need to consider these issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000449010

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 571

Metadata

Authors
Hamani, C., Aziz, T., Bloem, B. R., Brown, P., Chabardes, S., Coyne, T., Foote, K., Garcia-Rill, E., Hirsch, E. C., Lozano, A. M., Mazzone, P. A. M., Okun, M. S., Hutchison, W., Silburn, P., Zrinzo, L., Alam, M., Goetz, L., Pereira, E., Rughani, A., Thevathasan, W., Moro, E., & Krauss, J. K.
Venue
Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2016
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
298-306
ISSN
  • 1011-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0372
OpenAlex
W2530029380
Cited by
571
References
2
FWCI
33.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pedunculopontine Nucleus Region Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Surgical Anatomy and Terminology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000449010
The paper
Hamani, C., Aziz, T., Bloem, B. R., Brown, P., Chabardes, S., Coyne, T., Foote, K., Garcia-Rill, E., Hirsch, E. C., Lozano, A. M., Mazzone, P. A. M., Okun, M. S., Hutchison, W., Silburn, P., Zrinzo, L., Alam, M., Goetz, L., Pereira, E., Rughani, A., . . . Krauss, J. K. (2016). Pedunculopontine Nucleus Region Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Surgical Anatomy and Terminology. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1159/000449010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.