The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Difference of Gastric Emptying in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Functional Dyspepsia
Abstract
Background and Aim: Delayed gastric emptying is one of the reasons why functional dyspepsia (FD) occurs. The 13 C-acetate breath test is widely used to evaluate gastric emptying. Nevertheless, the standard value of 13 C-acetate breath test has not taken into account the gender difference of gastric emptying among healthy individuals. The main aim of this study was to readjust the standard value of 13 C-acetate breath test in the light of gender differences. In addition, we clarified the prevalence and clinical characteristics of delayed gastric emptying in patients with FD using the modified standard values of 13 C-acetate breath test. Methods: Fifty-two healthy individuals and 126 patients with patients with FD were enrolled. Gastric emptying was evaluated by the 13 C-acetate breath test. The cut-off points of T max for the diagnosis of delayed gastric emptying were determined on the basis of results from healthy individuals making a distinction of genders. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, dyspeptic symptoms, scores of anxiety and depression, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking and alcohol consumption were compared between the delayed gastric emptying group and the non-delayed gastric emptying group. Results: Since gastric emptying was delayed in healthy women compared with that in healthy men (T max, 53.6 ± 19.3 vs. 42.7 ± 16.9 min, p = 0.04), we set the cut-off points of T max at 60 min in men and at 75 min in women. In patients with FD, the prevalence of delayed gastric emptying was not different between men and women with the modified standard values of 13 C-acetate breath test. (31.0 vs. 27.4%, p = 0.68). BMI was lower in the delayed gastric emptying group than in the non-delayed group among the male patients. Reflux symptoms were more severe in delayed gastric emptying group than in the non-delayed group among the female patients. Conclusion: The standard values of 13 C-acetate breath test should be modified bearing the gender difference in mind. It provides us more appropriate information to understand the mechanisms of FD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“females exhibit slower gastric emptying and gut motility [202,203]”
From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [202]
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3 · Cited by 9,779
The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process
Drossman, D. A. (2006) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.008 · Cited by 2,416
Risk indicators of delayed gastric emptying of solids in patients with functional dyspepsia
Stanghellini, V, Tosetti, C., Paternicò, A., Barbara, G., Morselli-Labate, A., Monetti, N., Marengo, M., & Corinaldesi, R. (1996) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8612991 · Cited by 630
Symptoms associated with impaired gastric emptying of solids and liquids in functional dyspepsia
Sarnelli, G. (2003) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(03)00053-4 · Cited by 486
Braden, B., Adams, S., Duan, L.-P., Orth, K.-H., Maul, F.-D., Lembcke, B., Hör, G., & Caspary, W. F. (1995) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90202-3 · Cited by 294
Gender-related differences in gastric emptying.
Datz, F. L., Christian, P. E., & Moore, J. G. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 282
Validation of the GerdQ questionnaire for the diagnosis of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease
Jonasson, C., Wernersson, B., Hoff, D. A. L., & Hatlebakk, J. G. (2013) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12204 · Cited by 258
Hellmig, S., Schöning, F. V., Gadow, C., Katsoulis, S., Hedderich, J., Fölsch, U., & Stüber, E. (2006) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04449.x · Cited by 190
The Effect of Emotional Stress and Depression on the Prevalence of Digestive Diseases
Lee, S. P., Sung, I., Kim, J. H., Lee, S., Park, H. S., & Shim, C. S. (2015) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm14116 · Cited by 180
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07389.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Vijayvargiya, P., Jameie‐Oskooei, S., Camilleri, M., Chedid, V. G., Erwin, P. J., & Murad, M. H. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316405 · Cited by 223
Do Sex Differences in Physiology Confer a Female Advantage in Ultra-Endurance Sport?
Tiller, N. B., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Knechtle, B., Wilson, P. B., Roberts, J. D., & Millet, G. Y. (2021) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01417-2 · Cited by 113
International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete
Sims, S. T., Kerksick, C. M., Smith-Ryan, A. E., Janse de Jonge, X. A. K., Hirsch, K. R., Arent, S. M., Hewlings, S. J., Kleiner, S. M., Bustillo, E., Tartar, J. L., et al. (2023) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1080/15502783.2023.2204066 · Cited by 129
“Second, females exhibit slower gastric emptying and gut motility [202,203], a greater incidence of exercise-”
BackgroundOhtsu, T., Takagi, A., Uemura, N., Inoue, K., Sekino, H., Kawashima, A., Uchida, M., & Koga, Y. (2017) · Digestion · doi:10.1159/000479000 · Cited by 79
Functional Dyspepsia: A Narrative Review With a Focus on Sex-Gender Differences
Kim, Y. S., & Kim, N. (2020) · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · doi:10.5056/jnm20026 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Mori, H., Suzuki, H., Matsuzaki, J., Taniguchi, K., Shimizu, T., Yamane, T., Masaoka, T., & Kanai, T.
- Affiliations
- Keio University (JP)
- Venue
- Digestion
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-78
- ISSN
- 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9867
- OpenAlex
- W2568412429
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (vor)
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (tdm)
- Locations
- Digestion (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
- Eisai
- Astellas Pharma
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H05291)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Keywords
- functional dyspepsia, gastric emptying, delayed gastric emptying, 13C-acetate breath test, sex differences, reference values, cut-off values, Tmax, gastroesophageal reflux, prevalence, body mass index
- MeSH terms
- Acetates, Adult, Breath Tests, Dyspepsia, Female, Gastric Emptying, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reference Standards, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.