Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Clinical Impact of Bet v 6 in Birch Pollen-Sensitized Patients

Gellrich, Donata, Eder, Katharina, San Nicoló, Marion, Berghaus, Alexander, Gröger, Moritz·2017·International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

Abstract

Background: Bet v 6, a minor birch pollen allergen, is commercially available for allergen-specific IgE antibody testing. However, there is hardly any literature on the clinical impact of Bet v 6. The aim of the present study was to analyze if testing specific IgE against Bet v 6 can add valuable benefit to the standard diagnostics of birch pollen-sensitized patients, especially in patients with unknown sensitization-eliciting allergens. Methods: Birch pollen-sensitized patients with missing IgE reactivity against Bet v 1, 2, and 4 were tested for specific IgE antibodies against Bet v 6. For comparison, an equal number of randomly selected patients with birch pollen sensitization, regardless of their individual sensitization patterns, were tested for specific anti-Bet v 6. Results: Of 57 cases with missing reactivity against the standard birch pollen allergens, 2 patients were positive for Bet v 6. In the representative sample, 3 patients showed specific IgE against Bet v 6 - resulting in a total prevalence of 5%. None of the Bet v 6-positive patients showed allergic symptoms after exposure to birch pollen or an oral allergy syndrome. An increased prevalence of asthma and a higher degree of sensitization were the only distinctive clinical features in Bet v 6-positive patients. Conclusions: Among birch pollen-sensitized patients, the prevalence of specific IgE against Bet v 6 is low. Further, sensitization to Bet v 6, which shows characteristics of a panallergen, remains clinically silent. Therefore, determination of anti-Bet v 6 is not considered useful in the clinical routine.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000470843

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1111/all.12696 · DOI
  2. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00245.x · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70080-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF01610553 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/1710-1492-6-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1159/000321178 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01837.x · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00105-010-1967-y · DOI
  9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109075 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01807.x · DOI
  11. 10.1159/000444279 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00405-013-2609-7 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/all.12841 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/alr.21612 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03470.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01228.x · DOI
  17. 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283630ca5 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02460.x · DOI
  19. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1997.d01-418.x · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1998.00294.x · DOI
  21. 10.1159/000053670 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04132.x · DOI
  23. 10.1159/000082584 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/jf0491963 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/all.12676 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Gellrich, D., Eder, K., San Nicoló, M., Berghaus, A., & Gröger, M.
Venue
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
34-43
ISSN
  • 1018-2438
  • 1423-0097
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical Impact of Bet v 6 in Birch Pollen-Sensitized Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000470843
The paper
Gellrich, D., Eder, K., San Nicoló, M., Berghaus, A., & Gröger, M. (2017). The Clinical Impact of Bet v 6 in Birch Pollen-Sensitized Patients. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000470843