The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methodological Recommendations for Trials of Psychological Interventions
Open accessAbstract
Recent years have seen major developments in psychotherapy research that suggest the need to address critical methodological issues. These recommendations, developed by an international group of researchers, do not replace those for randomized controlled trials, but rather supplement strategies that need to be taken into account when considering psychological treatments. The limitations of traditional taxonomy and assessment methods are outlined, with suggestions for consideration of staging methods. Active psychotherapy control groups are recommended, and adaptive and dismantling study designs offer important opportunities. The treatments that are used, and particularly their specific ingredients, need to be described in detail for both the experimental and the control groups. Assessment should be performed blind before and after treatment and at long-term follow-up. A combination of observer- and self-rated measures is recommended. Side effects of psychotherapy should be evaluated using appropriate methods. Finally, the number of participants who deteriorate after treatment should be noted according to the methods that were used to define response or remission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c869 · Cited by 8,883
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., Niederehe, G., Thase, M. E., Lavori, P. W., Lebowitz, B. D., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905 · Cited by 5,643
Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Ravaud, P., & for the CONSORT Group* (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008 · Cited by 2,292
The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.
Reyes, A. D. L., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A. G., Burgers, D. E., & Rabinowitz, J. A. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038498 · Cited by 1,866
Three-Year Outcomes for Maintenance Therapies in Recurrent Depression
Frank, E. (1990) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810240013002 · Cited by 1,294
Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness
Kazdin, A. E., & Blase, S. L. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393527 · Cited by 1,254
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on psychological treatments research in tomorrow's science
Holmes, E. A., Ghaderi, A., Harmer, C. J., Ramchandani, P. G., Cuijpers, P., Morrison, A. P., Roiser, J. P., Bockting, C. L. H., O'Connor, R. C., Shafran, R., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30513-8 · Cited by 624
Self-citationMohr, D. C., Spring, B., Freedland, K. E., Beckner, V., Arean, P., Hollon, S. D., Ockene, J., & Kaplan, R. (2009) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000228248 · Cited by 565
Furukawa, T. A., Noma, H., Caldwell, D. M., Honyashiki, M., Shinohara, K., Imai, H., Chen, P., Hunot, V., & Churchill, R. (2014) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.12275 · Cited by 521
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10 Sensky T: Evaluating the evidence base of consultation-liaison psychiatry; in Hoyle L, Streltzer J (eds): Handbook of ConsultationLiaison Psychiatry. New York, Springer, 2007, pp 28-36.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–205 of 205
A atuação do psicólogo nas enfermarias de hospitais gerais
SOUSA, J. D. S., AVELAR, L. D. O., Borges, M. M., & de Oliveira, C. M. (2026) · Revista da SBPH · doi:10.57167/rev-sbph.2026.v29.948
Klinische Forschungsdesigns und Stichproben
Mundorf, A., Peterburs, J., & Ocklenburg, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-73259-5_5
Hoppen, T. H., Schlüter, S., Placzek, M., Lindemann, A. S., Kip, A., Schlechter, P., Meiser‐Stedman, R., & Nexhmedin Morina, B. (2026) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.70216
Tan, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1954656
Dalton, L. J., Rapa, E., Pascalis, L. D., Bozicevic, L., Verkuijl, N. E., GERRY, S., Goodacre, T., Cooper, P., Stein, A. L., & Murray, L. (2026) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1177/10556656261492389
Metadata
- Authors
- Guidi, J., Brakemeier, E.-L., Bockting, C. L. H., Cosci, F., Cuijpers, P., Jarrett, R. B., Linden, M., Marks, I., Peretti, C. S., Rafanelli, C., Rief, W., Schneider, S., Schnyder, U., Sensky, T., Tomba, E., Vazquez, C., Vieta, E., Zipfel, S., Wright, J. H., & Fava, G. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Florence (IT)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- King's College London (GB)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- University of Louisville (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 276-284
- ISSN
- 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0348
- OpenAlex
- W2883850069
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 29.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Dokumentenrepositorium der RUB (Ruhr University Bochum) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- psychological intervention, psychotherapy research methodology, treatment evaluation, treatment response and remission, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review