Cited by 134Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Prevalence and Incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment across Subtypes, Age, and Sex

Overton, Marieclaire, Pihlsgård, Mats, Elmståhl, Sölve·2019·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to report on the prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) across age, sex, and subtypes according to various criteria in a population-based sample. Methods: The sample was drawn from the Swedish Good Aging in Skåne (GÅS) population study, and data from 3,752 participants aged 60 years and more were used to calculate the MCI prevalence. The incidence was calculated using 2,093 participants with 6-year follow-up data. MCI was defined according to the expanded Mayo Clinic criteria: cognitive complaint, objective cognitive impairment (two different criteria depending on the severity of impairment), preserved functional abilities, and no dementia. Results: The prevalence estimates ranged from 5.13 to 29.9% depending on age and severity of impairment. The incidence rates of overall MCI were 22.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.6–25.9) and 8.67 (95% CI: 7.0–10.7) per 1,000 person-years for less severe and severe cognitive impairment, respectively. The highest prevalence and incidence estimates were found for “non-amnestic MCI single domain.” The older age groups had a higher prevalence, and no sex or age differences in MCI incidence were detected. Conclusion: Our findings concur with previous research advocating that MCI is a heterogeneous concept, since the prevalence and incidence estimates differed substantially according to age, MCI subtype, and severity of cognitive impairment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000499763

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overton, M., Pihlsgård, M., & Elmståhl, S.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019
Volume
47
Issue
4-6
Pages
219-232
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2958614151
Cited by
134
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, prevalence, incidence, MCI subtypes, cognitive impairment severity, age differences, sex differences, Mayo Clinic criteria, older adults
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Sweden, Incidence, Prevalence, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review