Cited by 53Fatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

A Scoping Review of Current Guidelines on Dietary Fat and Fat Quality

Schwingshackl, Lukas, Zähringer, Jasmin, Beyerbach, Jessica, Werner, Sarah S., Nagavci, Blin, Heseker, Helmut, Koletzko, Berthold, Meerpohl, Joerg J. +1 more·2021·Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Introduction: We conducted a scoping review of dietary guidelines with the intent of developing a position paper by the “IUNS Task force on Dietary Fat Quality” tasked to summarize the available evidence and provide the basis for dietary recommendations. Methods: We systematically searched several databases and Web sites for relevant documents published between 2015 and 2019. Results: Twenty documents were included. Quantitative range intake recommendations for daily total fat intake included boundaries from 20 to 35% of total energy intake (TEI), for monounsaturated fat (MUFA) 10–25%, for polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) 6–11%, for saturated-fat (SFA) ≤11–≤7%, for industrial trans-fat (TFA) ≤2–0%, and <300–<200 mg/d for dietary cholesterol. The methodological approaches to grade the strength of recommendations were heterogeneous, and varied highly between the included guidelines. Only the World Health Organization applied the GRADE approach and graded the following recommendation as “strong”: to reduce SFA to below 10%, and TFA to below 1% and replace both with PUFA if SFA intake is greater than 10% of TEI. Conclusion: Although the methodological approaches of the dietary guidelines were heterogeneous, most of them recommend total fat intakes of 30–≤35% of TEI, replacement of SFA with PUFA and MUFA, and avoidance of industrial TFA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000515671

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwingshackl, L., Zähringer, J., Beyerbach, J., Werner, S. S., Nagavci, B., Heseker, H., Koletzko, B., Meerpohl, J. J., & on behalf of the International Union of Nutritional Sciences (IUNS) Task force on Dietary Fat Quality
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Paderborn University (DE)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
Venue
Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2021
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
65-82
ISSN
  • 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9697
OpenAlex
W3169570510
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
dietary fat, fat quality, dietary guidelines, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, monounsaturated fatty acids, industrial trans fats, dietary cholesterol, total fat intake, energy intake, dietary recommendations, strength of recommendation, GRADE
MeSH terms
Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Fats, Fatty Acids, Humans, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review