Painful temporomandibular disorders are common in patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and impact significantly upon quality of life
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To explore the point prevalence of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in a well-characterized clinical cohort of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) sufferers and to understand the functional and physiologic impact of this comorbidity on the patient. METHODS: Patients with PoTS were retrospectively recruited from a previous study conducted in a UK hospital setting. Data had previously been collected on several parameters, including sociodemographic, physiologic, and functional. The participants were mailed a highly sensitive (99%) and specific (97%) self-report screening instrument for painful TMD. Simple descriptive statistics with Fisher Exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine the data and draw inferences from it. RESULTS: A total of 36 individuals responded (69% response rate). Just under half (47%) of the sample screened positive for painful TMD. There was no significant difference between the screening result for TMD or previously reported headaches or joint pain (P < .05). Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was diagnosed by the Fukuda Criteria in 44% of the total sample and in 56% of those with painful TMD. There were no significant differences in physiologic parameters in CFS and TMD. TMD caused a significant decrease in quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Health Assessment Questionnaire (P < .05). CONCLUSION: TMD are common in patients with PoTS. They have a significant, additional impact on patients' quality of life and should therefore be screened for at an early stage in PoTS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Durham and colleagues found that 17 of 36 adults with POTS (47%) had temporomandibular disorders.
“They identi fi ed 17 (47%) as having TMD and concluded that this elevated prevalence ' adds further support to the conditions having a similar underlying dysautonomic pathophysiology. '”
From Postural tachycardia syndrome and other forms of orthostatic intolerance in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (2018) · cites this paper as Durham et al., 2015
- Authors
- Durham, J., McDonald, C., Hutchinson, L., & Newton, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
- Publisher
- MRE Press
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-157
- ISSN
- 2333-0376 (ISSN-L)
- 2333-0384
- OpenAlex
- W1991112717
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Microsoft
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-CS-011-003, ACF-2008-01-005, CL-2008-01-007)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Keywords
- painful temporomandibular disorders, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, quality of life, comorbidities, prevalence, headache, joint pain, screening, autonomic dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Blood Pressure, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Sleep Stages, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Cohort Studies, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review