Cited by 10Temporomandibular Joint DisordersFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Painful temporomandibular disorders are common in patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and impact significantly upon quality of life

Open access
Durham, Justin, McDonald, Claire, Hutchinson, Luke, Newton, Julia·2015·Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache

Abstract

AIMS: To explore the point prevalence of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in a well-characterized clinical cohort of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) sufferers and to understand the functional and physiologic impact of this comorbidity on the patient. METHODS: Patients with PoTS were retrospectively recruited from a previous study conducted in a UK hospital setting. Data had previously been collected on several parameters, including sociodemographic, physiologic, and functional. The participants were mailed a highly sensitive (99%) and specific (97%) self-report screening instrument for painful TMD. Simple descriptive statistics with Fisher Exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine the data and draw inferences from it. RESULTS: A total of 36 individuals responded (69% response rate). Just under half (47%) of the sample screened positive for painful TMD. There was no significant difference between the screening result for TMD or previously reported headaches or joint pain (P < .05). Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was diagnosed by the Fukuda Criteria in 44% of the total sample and in 56% of those with painful TMD. There were no significant differences in physiologic parameters in CFS and TMD. TMD caused a significant decrease in quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Health Assessment Questionnaire (P < .05). CONCLUSION: TMD are common in patients with PoTS. They have a significant, additional impact on patients' quality of life and should therefore be screened for at an early stage in PoTS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11607/ofph.1396

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Durham, J., McDonald, C., Hutchinson, L., & Newton, J.
Venue
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Publisher
MRE Press
Published
2015-05
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
152-157
ISSN
  • 2333-0376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2333-0384
OpenAlex
W1991112717
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Microsoft
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-CS-011-003, ACF-2008-01-005, CL-2008-01-007)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
painful temporomandibular disorders, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, quality of life, comorbidities, prevalence, headache, joint pain, screening, autonomic dysfunction
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Blood Pressure, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Sleep Stages, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Cohort Studies, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review