Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ccr5 But Not Ccr1 Deficiency Reduces Development of Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis in Mice

Open access
Braunersreuther, Vincent, Zernecke, Alma, Arnaud, Claire, Liehn, Elisa A., Steffens, Sabine, Shagdarsuren, Erdenechimeg, Bidzhekov, Kiril, Burger, Fabienne, Pelli, Graziano, Luckow, Bruno, Mach, François, Weber, Christian·2007·Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

Abstract

Objective— Chemokines and their receptors are crucially involved in the development of atherosclerotic lesions by directing monocyte and T cell recruitment. The CC-chemokine receptors 1 (CCR1) and 5 (CCR5) expressed on these cells bind chemokines implicated in atherosclerosis, namely CCL5/RANTES. Although general blockade of CCL5 receptors reduces atherosclerosis, specific roles of CCR1 and CCR5 have not been unequivocally determined. Methods and Results— We provide two independent lines of investigation to dissect the effects of Ccr1 and Ccr5 deletion in apolipoprotein E–deficient (ApoE −/− ) mice in a collaboration between Aachen/Germany and Geneva/Switzerland. Different strains of ApoE −/− Ccr5 −/− mice, ApoE −/− Ccr1 −/− mice or respective littermates, were fed a high-fat diet for 10 to 12 weeks. Plaque areas were quantified in the aortic roots and thoracoabdominal aortas. Concordantly, both laboratories found that lesion formation was reduced in ApoE −/− Ccr5 −/− mice. Plaque quality and immune cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry or mRNA analysis. Whereas lesional macrophage content, aortic CD4, and Th1-related Tim3 expression were reduced, smooth muscle cell (SMC) content and expression of interleukin-10 in plaques, lesional SMCs, and splenocytes were elevated. Protection against lesion formation by Ccr5 deficiency was sustained over 22 weeks of high-fat diet or over 26 weeks of chow diet. Conversely, plaque area, T cell, and interferon-γ content were increased in ApoE −/− Ccr1 −/− mice. Conclusion— Genetic deletion of Ccr5 but not Ccr1 in ApoE −/− mice protects from diet-induced atherosclerosis, associated with a more stable plaque phenotype, reduced mononuclear cell infiltration, Th1-type immune responses, and increased interleukin-10 expression. This corroborates CCR5 as a promising therapeutic target.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.atv.0000253886.44609.ae

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Braunersreuther, V., Zernecke, A., Arnaud, C., Liehn, E. A., Steffens, S., Shagdarsuren, E., Bidzhekov, K., Burger, F., Pelli, G., Luckow, B., Mach, F., & Weber, C.
Venue
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Published
2007-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
373-379
ISSN
  • 1079-5642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4636
OpenAlex
W2104899502
Cited by
288
References
3
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.