The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic modulus of the radial artery wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension.
Open accessAbstract
Hypertension is known to decrease arterial distensibility and systemic compliance. However, the arterial tree is not homogeneous, and it has been shown that the medium-size radial artery does not behave like the proximal, elastic, large, common carotid artery. Indeed, radial artery compliance in hypertensive patients (HTs) has been shown to be paradoxically increased when compared with that in normotensive control subjects (NTs) at the same blood pressure level. To determine whether this increase was due to hypertension-related hypertrophy of the arterial wall, radial artery functional and geometric parameters from 22 NTs (mean +/- SD, 44 +/- 11 years) were compared with those from 25 age- and sex-matched never-treated essential HTs (48 +/- 12 years) by using a high-precision ultrasonic, echo-tracking system coupled to a photoplethysmograph (Finapres system), which allows simultaneous arterial internal diameter, intima-media thickness, and finger blood pressure measurements. When the values for HTs were compared with those of NTs at their respective mean arterial pressures, HTs had similar internal diameter (2.50 +/- 0.56 versus 2.53 +/- 0.32 mm, mean +/- SD) and greater intima-media thickness (0.40 +/- 0.06 versus 0.28 +/- 0.05 mm, P < .001) measurements and increased arterial wall cross-sectional areas (3.79 +/- 1.14 versus 2.45 +/- 0.57 mm2, P < .001). Circumferential wall stress was not significantly different between the two groups. Compliance calculated for a given blood pressure, ie, 100 mm Hg (C100), was greater in HTs than NTs (3.46 +/- 2.41 versus 2.10 +/- 1.55 m2.kPa-1 x 10(-8), P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physiological aspects of primary hypertension.
Folkow, B. (1982) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1982.62.2.347 · Cited by 1,768
Parati, G., Casadei, R., Groppelli, A., Di Rienzo, M., & Mancia, G. (1989) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.13.6.647 · Cited by 899
Cited by
Mitchell, G. F. (2008) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90549.2008 · Cited by 764
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Self-citationStructural and Genetic Bases of Arterial Stiffness
Laurent, S., Boutouyrie, P., & Lacolley, P. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000164580.39991.3d · Cited by 435
Self-citationValidation of a device to measure arterial pulse wave velocity by a photoplethysmographic method
Loukogeorgakis, S., Dawson, R., Phillips, N., Martyn, C. N., & Greenwald, S. E. (2002) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/23/3/309 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurent, S., Girerd, X., Mourad, J. J., Lacolley, P., Beck, L., Boutouyrie, P., Mignot, J. P., & Safar, M.
- Venue
- Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1223-1231
- ISSN
- 1049-8834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069087338
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elastic modulus of the radial artery wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.atv.14.7.1223
- The paper
- Laurent, S., Girerd, X., Mourad, J. J., Lacolley, P., Beck, L., Boutouyrie, P., Mignot, J. P., & Safar, M. (1994). Elastic modulus of the radial artery wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.14.7.1223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.