Cited by 899Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing.

Parati, G, Casadei, R, Groppelli, A, Di Rienzo, M, Mancia, G·1989·Hypertension

Abstract

The accuracy of blood pressure values obtained by continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure recording via the FINAPRES device was evaluated by comparison with simultaneous intraarterial monitoring both at rest and during performance of tests known to induce fast and often marked changes in blood pressure. The comparison was performed in 24 normotensive or essential hypertensive subjects. The average discrepancy between finger and intra-arterial blood pressure recorded over a 30-minute rest period was 6.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg and 5.4 +/- 2.9 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; a close between-method correspondence was also demonstrated by linear regression analysis. The beat-to-beat changes in finger systolic and diastolic blood pressure were on average similar to those measured intra-arterially during tests that induced a pressor or depressor response (hand-grip, cold pressor test, diving test, Valsalva maneuver, intravenous injections of phenylephrine and trinitroglycerine) as well as during tests that caused vasomotor changes without major variations in blood pressure (application of lower body negative pressure, passive leg raising). The average between-method discrepancy in the evaluation of blood pressure changes was never greater than 4.3 and 2.0 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; the corresponding standard deviations ranged between 4.6 and 1.6 mm Hg. Beat-to-beat computer analysis of blood pressure variability over the 30-minute rest period provided standard deviations almost identical when calculated by separate consideration of intra-arterial and finger blood pressure tracings (3.7 and 3.8 mm Hg, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.13.6.647

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parati, G., Casadei, R., Groppelli, A., Di Rienzo, M., & Mancia, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Cattedra di Semeiotica Medica, Università di Milano, Italy.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1989-06
Volume
13
Issue
6_pt_1
Pages
647-655
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2072733073
Cited by
899
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academisch Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
finger blood pressure, intra-arterial blood pressure, Finapres, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, measurement accuracy, beat-to-beat blood pressure variability, essential hypertension, cold pressor test, Valsalva maneuver, handgrip test, lower body negative pressure, passive leg raising, phenylephrine
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Catheters, Indwelling, Female, Fingers, Nitroglycerin, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Plethysmography, Pressoreceptors, Rest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review