Cited by 123Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Surface electrocardiographic characteristics of right and left atrial flutter

Bochoeyer, Andres, Yang, Yanfei, Cheng, Jie, Lee, Randall J., Keung, Edmund C., Marrouche, Nassir F., Natale, Andrea, Scheinman, Melvin M.·2003·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little information about the surface expression of non-cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent right atrial (RA) or left atrial (LA) flutter circuits. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated 32 episodes (in 26 patients) of atypical RA and 22 episodes (in 21 patients) of LA flutter. The surface ECG of 13 patients with lower-loop reentry was similar to that of their pattern during counterclockwise (CCW) CTI atrial flutter (AFL), except for decreased amplitude of the terminal forces in the inferior leads. In 11 of 24 episodes characterized by high or multiple breaks over the crista, the ECG showed changes that depended on the initial activation sequence of the LA. In 7 of 8 episodes of upper-loop reentry, the ECG pattern completely mimicked that for clockwise (CW) CTI AFL. All 11 patients with an LA septal circuit showed a typical ECG pattern characterized by prominent forces in lead V1 with flat deflections in the other surface leads. Eleven patients with other LA circuits had a more variable pattern but showed decreased voltage in the inferior leads compared with that of a group with CCW-CTI AFL (1.6+/-1 vs 2.68+/-0.7 mV, respectively; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The RA surface-ECG patterns different from those of CCW or CW-CTI could still be CTI dependent. In contrast, a typical CW-CTI surface pattern was always seen in patients with upper-loop reentry, which was non-CTI dependent. LA AFL circuits had either flat or low-amplitude forces in the inferior leads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000079140.35025.1e

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bochoeyer, A., Yang, Y., Cheng, J., Lee, R. J., Keung, E. C., Marrouche, N. F., Natale, A., & Scheinman, M. M.
Affiliations
  • *Drs Bochoeyer and Yang are co-first authors.
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-07-08
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
60-66
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1972673621
Cited by
123
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
atrial flutter, right atrial flutter, left atrial flutter, inferior leads, crista terminalis
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Flutter, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Atria, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Catheter Ablation, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review