Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Versus Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study

Okin, Peter M., Devereux, Richard B., Jern, Sverker, Kjeldsen, Sverre E., Julius, Stevo, Nieminen, Markku S., Snapinn, Steven, Harris, Katherine E., Aurup, Peter, Edelman, Jonathan M., Dahlöf, Björn·2003·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and regression of ECG LVH may predict improved prognosis in hypertensive patients. However, uncertainty persists as to how best to regress ECG LVH. Methods and Results— Regression of ECG LVH with losartan versus atenolol therapy was assessed in 9193 hypertensive patients with ECG LVH by Sokolow-Lyon voltage or Cornell voltage-duration product criteria enrolled in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study. Patients had ECGs at study baseline and after 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years of blinded losartan-based or atenolol-based therapy. After 6 months’ follow-up, adjusting for baseline ECG LVH levels, baseline and in-treatment systolic and diastolic pressures, and for diuretic therapy, losartan-based therapy was associated with greater regression of both Cornell product (adjusted means, −200 versus −69 mm · ms, P <0.001) and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (−2.5 versus −0.7 mm, P <0.001) than was atenolol-based therapy. Greater regression of ECG LVH persisted at each subsequent annual evaluation in the losartan-treated group, with between 140 and 164 mm · ms greater mean reductions in Cornell product and from 1.7 to 2.2 mm greater mean reductions in Sokolow-Lyon voltage (all P <0.001). The effect of losartan was consistent across subgroups defined by gender, age, ethnicity, and diabetes. Conclusions— After adjusting for baseline and in-treatment blood pressure and baseline severity of ECG LVH, losartan-based antihypertensive therapy resulted in greater regression of ECG LVH by Cornell voltage-duration product and Sokolow-Lyon voltage criteria than did atenolol-based therapy. These findings support the value of angiotensin receptor blockade with losartan for reversing ECG LVH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000083724.28630.c3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Okin, P. M., Devereux, R. B., Jern, S., Kjeldsen, S. E., Julius, S., Nieminen, M. S., Snapinn, S., Harris, K. E., Aurup, P., Edelman, J. M., & Dahlöf, B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-08-12
Volume
108
Issue
6
Pages
684-690
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2151423733
Cited by
257
References
24
FWCI
14.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Versus Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000083724.28630.c3
The paper
Okin, P. M., Devereux, R. B., Jern, S., Kjeldsen, S. E., Julius, S., Nieminen, M. S., Snapinn, S., Harris, K. E., Aurup, P., Edelman, J. M., & Dahlöf, B. (2003). Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Versus Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000083724.28630.c3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.