Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 831

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound

Achenbach, Stephan, Moselewski, Fabian, Ropers, Dieter, Ferencik, Maros, Hoffmann, Udo, MacNeill, Briain, Pohle, Karsten, Baum, Ulrich, Anders, Katharina, Jang, Ik-kyung, Daniel, Werner G., Brady, Thomas J.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— We investigated the ability of multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) to detect atherosclerotic plaque in nonstenotic coronary arteries. Methods and Results— In 22 patients without significant coronary stenoses, contrast-enhanced MDCT (0.75-mm collimation, 420-ms rotation) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) of one coronary artery were performed. A total of 83 coronary segments were imaged by IVUS (left main, 19; left anterior descending, 51; left circumflex, 4; right coronary, 9). MDCT data sets were evaluated for the presence and volume of plaque in the coronary artery segments. Results were compared with IVUS in a blinded fashion. For the detection of segments with any plaque, MDCT had a sensitivity of 82% (41 of 50) and specificity of 88% (29 of 33). For calcified plaque, sensitivity was 94% (33 of 36) and specificity 94% (45 of 47). Coronary segments containing noncalcified plaque were detected with a sensitivity of 78% (35 of 45) and specificity of 87% (33 of 38), but presence of exclusively noncalcified plaque was detected with only 53% sensitivity (8 of 15). If analysis was limited to the 41 proximal segments (segments 1, 5, 6, and 11 according to American Heart Association classification), sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 88% for any plaque, 95% and 91% for calcified plaque, and 91% and 89% for noncalcified plaque. MDCT substantially underestimated plaque volume per segment as compared with IVUS (24±35 mm 3 versus 43±60 mm 3 , P <0.001). Conclusions— The results indicate the potential of MDCT to detect coronary atherosclerotic plaque in patients without significant coronary stenoses. However, further improvements in image quality will be necessary to achieve reliable assessment, especially of noncalcified plaque throughout the coronary tree.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000111517.69230.0f

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 831

Metadata

Authors
Achenbach, S., Moselewski, F., Ropers, D., Ferencik, M., Hoffmann, U., MacNeill, B., Pohle, K., Baum, U., Anders, K., Jang, I.-K., Daniel, W. G., & Brady, T. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-01-06
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
14-17
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2616018170
Cited by
831
References
8
FWCI
36.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000111517.69230.0f
The paper
Achenbach, S., Moselewski, F., Ropers, D., Ferencik, M., Hoffmann, U., MacNeill, B., Pohle, K., Baum, U., Anders, K., Jang, I.-K., Daniel, W. G., & Brady, T. J. (2004). Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000111517.69230.0f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.