The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant Hypertension
Abstract
Background— In patients with a malignant hypertension, immediate parenteral treatment with blood pressure–lowering agents such as intravenous sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is indicated. In this study, we evaluated static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) during acute blood pressure lowering with SNP in these patients. Methods and Results— In 8 patients with mean arterial pressure (MAP) >140 mm Hg and grade III or IV hypertensive retinopathy at hospital admission, middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCA V) and blood pressure were monitored. Dynamic CA was expressed as the 0.1-Hz MCA V mean to MAP phase lead and static CA as the MCA V mean to MAP relationship during SNP treatment. Eight normotensive subjects served as a reference group. In the patients, the MCA V mean to MAP phase lead was lower (30±8° versus 58±5°, mean±SEM; P <0.05), whereas the transfer gain tended to be higher. During SNP treatment, target MAP was reached within 90 minutes in all patients. The MCA V mean decrease was 22±4%, along with a 27±3% reduction in MAP (from 166±4 to 121±6 mm Hg; P <0.05) in a linear fashion (averaged slope, 0.82±0.15% cm · s −1 · % mm Hg −1 ; r =0.70±0.07). Conclusions— In patients with malignant hypertension, dynamic CA is impaired. An MCA V mean plateau was not detected during the whole SNP treatment, indicating loss of static CA as well. This study showed that during the whole rapid reduction in blood pressure with SNP, MCA V mean decreases almost one on one with MAP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005 · Cited by 3,777
Syncope, cerebral perfusion, and oxygenation
Van Lieshout, J. J., Wieling, W., Karemaker, J. M., & Secher, N. H. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00260.2002 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Cited by
The Science of Stroke: Mechanisms in Search of Treatments
Moskowitz, M. A., Lo, E. H., & Iadecola, C. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.002 · Cited by 1,930
The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019)
Umemura, S., Arima, H., Arima, S., Asayama, K., Dohi, Y., Hirooka, Y., Horio, T., Hoshide, S., Ikeda, S., Ishimitsu, T., et al. (2019) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9 · Cited by 1,880
Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation
Claassen, J. A. H. R., Thijssen, D. H. J., Panerai, R. B., & Faraci, F. M. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00022.2020 · Cited by 915
Hypertension and Cerebrovascular Dysfunction
Iadecola, C., & Davisson, R. L. (2008) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.010 · Cited by 557
Brozovich, F. V., Nicholson, C. J., Degen, C. V., Gao, Y. Z., Aggarwal, M., & Morgan, K. G. (2016) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.115.010652 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Immink, R. V., van den Born, B.-J. H., van Montfrans, G. A., Koopmans, R. P., Karemaker, J. M., & van Lieshout, J. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-10-12
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2241-2245
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2109447375
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000144472.08647.40
- The paper
- Immink, R. V., van den Born, B.-J. H., van Montfrans, G. A., Koopmans, R. P., Karemaker, J. M., & van Lieshout, J. J. (2004). Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients With Malignant Hypertension. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000144472.08647.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.