Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization on Disease Progression in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, an Indication for an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, and Mildly Symptomatic Chronic Heart Failure

Abraham, William T., Young, James B., León, Angel R., Adler, Stuart, Bank, Alan J., Hall, Shelley A., Lieberman, Randy, Liem, L. Bing, O’Connell, John B., Schroeder, John S., Wheelan, Kevin R.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure have not been fully elucidated. Methods and Results— The Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation II (MIRACLE ICD II) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial of CRT in NYHA class II heart failure patients on optimal medical therapy with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35%, a QRS ≥130 ms, and a class I indication for an ICD. One hundred eighty-six patients were randomized: 101 to the control group (ICD activated, CRT off) and 85 to the CRT group (ICD activated, CRT on). End points included peak V̇ o 2 , V̇ e /V̇ co 2 , NYHA class, quality of life, 6-minute walk distance, LV volumes and ejection fraction, and composite clinical response. Compared with the control group at 6 months, no significant improvement was noted in peak V̇ o 2 , yet there were significant improvements in ventricular remodeling indexes, specifically LV diastolic and systolic volumes ( P =0.04 and P =0.01, respectively), and LV ejection fraction ( P =0.02). CRT patients showed statistically significant improvement in V̇ e /V̇ co 2 ( P =0.01), NYHA class ( P =0.05), and clinical composite response ( P =0.01). No significant differences were noted in 6-minute walk distance or quality of life scores. Conclusions— In patients with mild heart failure symptoms on optimal medical therapy with a wide QRS complex and an ICD indication, CRT did not alter exercise capacity but did result in significant improvement in cardiac structure and function and composite clinical response over 6 months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000146336.92331.d1

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
Abraham, W. T., Young, J. B., León, A. R., Adler, S., Bank, A. J., Hall, S. A., Lieberman, R., Liem, L. B., O’Connell, J. B., Schroeder, J. S., & Wheelan, K. R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-11-02
Volume
110
Issue
18
Pages
2864-2868
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2110628407
Cited by
559
References
17
FWCI
22.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization on Disease Progression in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, an Indication for an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, and Mildly Symptomatic Chronic Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000146336.92331.d1
The paper
Abraham, W. T., Young, J. B., León, A. R., Adler, S., Bank, A. J., Hall, S. A., Lieberman, R., Liem, L. B., O’Connell, J. B., Schroeder, J. S., & Wheelan, K. R. (2004). Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization on Disease Progression in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, an Indication for an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator, and Mildly Symptomatic Chronic Heart Failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000146336.92331.d1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.