Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,560

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update and Simplification of the Utstein Templates for Resuscitation Registries: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa)

Open access
Jacobs, Ian, Nadkarni, Vinay, the ILCOR Task Force on Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes, CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS, Bahr, Jan, Berg, Robert A., Billi, John E., Bossaert, Leo, Cassan, Pascal, Coovadia, Ashraf, D’Este, Kate, Finn, Judith, Halperin, Henry, Handley, Anthony, Herlitz, Johan, Hickey, Robert, Idris, Ahamed, Kloeck, Walter, Larkin, Gregory Luke, Mancini, Mary Elizabeth, Mason, Pip, Mears, Gregory, Monsieurs, Koenraad, Montgomery, William, Morley, Peter, Nichol, Graham, Nolan, Jerry, Okada, Kazuo, Perlman, Jeffrey, Shuster, Michael, Steen, Petter Andreas, Sterz, Fritz, Tibballs, James, Timerman, Sergio, Truitt, Tanya, Zideman, David·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Outcome after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation is dependent on critical interventions, particularly early defibrillation, effective chest compressions, and advanced life support. Utstein-style definitions and reporting templates have been used extensively in published studies of cardiac arrest, which has led to greater understanding of the elements of resuscitation practice and progress toward international consensus on science and resuscitation guidelines. Despite the development of Utstein templates to standardize research reports of cardiac arrest, international registries have yet to be developed. In April 2002, a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) met in Melbourne, Australia, to review worldwide experience with the Utstein definitions and reporting templates. The task force revised the core reporting template and definitions by consensus. Care was taken to build on previous definitions, changing data elements and operational definitions only on the basis of published data and experience derived from those registries that have used Utstein-style reporting. Attention was focused on decreasing the complexity of the existing templates and addressing logistical difficulties in collecting specific core and supplementary (ie, essential and desirable) data elements recommended by previous Utstein consensus conferences. Inconsistencies in terminology between in-hospital and out-of-hospital Utstein templates were also addressed. The task force produced a reporting tool for essential data that can be used for both quality improvement (registries) and research reports and that should be applicable to both adults and children. The revised and simplified template includes practical and succinct operational definitions. It is anticipated that the revised template will enable better and more accurate completion of all reports of cardiac arrest and resuscitation attempts. Problems with data definition, collection, linkage, confidentiality, management, and registry implementation are acknowledged and potential solutions offered. Uniform collection and tracking of registry data should enable better continuous quality improvement within every hospital, emergency medical services system, and community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000147236.85306.15

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,560

Metadata

Authors
Jacobs, I., Nadkarni, V., the ILCOR Task Force on Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes, PARTICIPANTS, C., Bahr, J., Berg, R. A., Billi, J. E., Bossaert, L., Cassan, P., Coovadia, A., D’Este, K., Finn, J., Halperin, H., Handley, A., Herlitz, J., Hickey, R., Idris, A., Kloeck, W., Larkin, G. L., Mancini, M. E., Mason, P., Mears, G., Monsieurs, K., Montgomery, W., Morley, P., Nichol, G., Nolan, J., Okada, K., Perlman, J., Shuster, M., Steen, P. A., Sterz, F., Tibballs, J., Timerman, S., Truitt, T., & Zideman, D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-11-23
Volume
110
Issue
21
Pages
3385-3397
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2117286964
Cited by
2,560
References
0
FWCI
39.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update and Simplification of the Utstein Templates for Resuscitation Registries: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000147236.85306.15
The paper
Jacobs, I., Nadkarni, V., the ILCOR Task Force on Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes, PARTICIPANTS, C., Bahr, J., Berg, R. A., Billi, J. E., Bossaert, L., Cassan, P., Coovadia, A., D’Este, K., Finn, J., Halperin, H., Handley, A., Herlitz, J., Hickey, R., Idris, A., Kloeck, W., Larkin, G. L., . . . Zideman, D. (2004). Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update and Simplification of the Utstein Templates for Resuscitation Registries: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian Resuscitation Council, New Zealand Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Councils of Southern Africa). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000147236.85306.15

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.