The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survival, Integration, and Differentiation of Cardiomyocyte Grafts: A Study in Normal and Injured Rat Hearts
Open accessAbstract
Background —Cardiomyocyte grafting augments myocyte numbers in the heart. We investigated (1) how developmental stage influences graft survival; (2) whether acutely necrotic or healing cardiac lesions support grafts; and (3) the differentiation and integration of cardiomyocyte grafts in injured hearts. Methods and Results —Cardiomyocytes from fetal, neonatal, or adult inbred rats were grafted into normal myocardium, acutely cryoinjured myocardium, or granulation tissue (6 days after injury). Adult cardiomyocytes did not survive under any conditions. In contrast, fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes formed viable grafts under all conditions. Time-course studies with neonatal cardiomyocytes showed that the grafts recapitulated many aspects of normal development. The adherens junction protein N-cadherin was distributed circumferentially at day 1 but began to organize into intercalated disk–like structures by day 6. The gap junction protein connexin43 followed a similar but delayed pattern relative to N-cadherin. From 2 to 8 weeks, there was progressive hypertrophy and the formation of mature intercalated disks. In some hearts, graft cells formed adherens and gap junctions with host cardiomyocytes, suggesting electromechanical coupling. More commonly, however, grafts were separated from the host myocardium by scar tissue. Gap and adherens junctions formed between neonatal and adult cardiomyocytes in coculture, as evidenced by dye transfer and localization of cadherin and connexin43 at intercellular junctions. Conclusions —Grafted fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes form new, mature myocardium with the capacity to couple with injured host myocardium. Optimal repair, however, may require reducing the isolation of the graft by the intervening scar tissue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laflamme, M. A., & Murry, C. E. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1117 · Cited by 964
Self-citationEngineering Adolescence: Maturation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell–Derived Cardiomyocytes
Yang, X., Pabon, L., & Murry, C. E. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.114.300558 · Cited by 939
Self-citationTissue Engineering of a Differentiated Cardiac Muscle Construct
Zimmermann, W.-H., Schneiderbanger, K., Schubert, P., Didié, M., Münzel, F., Heubach, J. F., Kostin, S., Neuhuber, W. L., & Eschenhagen, T. (2002) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/hh0202.103644 · Cited by 917
Cardiomyocyte Grafting for Cardiac Repair: Graft Cell Death and Anti-Death Strategies
Zhang, M., Methot, D., Poppa, V., Fujio, Y., Walsh, K., & Murry, C. E. (2001) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1006/jmcc.2001.1367 · Cited by 878
Self-citationBurridge, P. W., Keller, G., Gold, J. D., & Wu, J. C. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2011.12.013 · Cited by 670
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinecke, H., Zhang, M., Bartosek, T., & Murry, C. E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-07-13
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-202
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2162482990
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival, Integration, and Differentiation of Cardiomyocyte Grafts: A Study in Normal and Injured Rat Hearts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.100.2.193
- The paper
- Reinecke, H., Zhang, M., Bartosek, T., & Murry, C. E. (1999). Survival, Integration, and Differentiation of Cardiomyocyte Grafts: A Study in Normal and Injured Rat Hearts. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.2.193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.