The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Late Thrombosis After Radiation: Sitting on a Time Bomb
Open accessAbstract
ive years after Condado et al 1 first treated human coronary arteries with brachytherapy, there is ongoing clinical investigation into its safety and efficacy in preventing restenosis.As with any novel technique, unexpected complications may dampen early high expectations and result in pessimism and skepticism.However, time, experience, and complete data analysis will determine the reality. See p 789Costa and coworkers 2 may be reacting prematurely by reporting a new phenomenon in interventional cardiology entitled "late, sudden thrombosis after PTCA plus radiotherapy."They report 6 (6.6%) of 91 patients who presented with late total occlusion/thrombosis at angiographic follow-up; these patients were enrolled into different radiation protocols using different -emitters at different prescribed doses.Late total occlusion or late thrombosis is a valid concern, especially when associated with acute myocardial infarction (MI).However, can we really draw any conclusion from 6 heterogeneous case reports taken from a small cohort of patients in the absence of a control group?Is this announcement based on too few data, and is it premature?An editorial based on a Brief Rapid Communication mandates the editorialist to gather additional information, disclose his own insights, and provide the readers (the jury in this case) with as much information as possible. Definition and NomenclatureAcute thrombosis occurs during or early after intervention, and subacute thrombosis occurs within the subsequent 30 days.Both usually present with unstable symptoms and angiographic evidence of thrombus.However, the definition of late thrombosis may be problematic.It may not present with symptoms.It may be detected only when follow-up angiography shows a late total occlusion, which could also be the result of progressive intimal hyperplasia.Late total occlusion/thrombosis should be defined as any angiographically documented total occlusion Ͼ30 days after the proce-dure.For patients who have a patent treatment site at 6 months and subsequently develop a total occlusion, we propose the term "late late thrombosis."Based on these new definitions, the investigators presented 4 patients with late thrombosis and 2 with late late thrombosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathological Mechanisms of Fatal Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis in Humans
Farb, A., Burke, A. P., Kolodgie, F. D., & Virmani, R. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000091115.05480.b0 · Cited by 478
Coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies
Lowe, H. C., Oesterle, S. N., & Khachigian, L. M. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01742-9 · Cited by 414
The Road to Bioabsorbable Stents: Reaching Clinical Reality?
Erne, P., Schier, M., & Resink, T. J. (2006) · CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00270-004-0341-9 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Waksman, R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-08-24
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 780-782
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2168630222
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Late Thrombosis After Radiation: Sitting on a Time Bomb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.100.8.780
- The paper
- Waksman, R. (1999). Late Thrombosis After Radiation: Sitting on a Time Bomb. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.8.780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.