The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation: Results From an International Trial of 9461 Patients
Open accessAbstract
Background —Appropriate treatment policies should include an accurate estimate of a patient’s baseline risk. Risk modeling to date has been underutilized in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Methods and Results —We analyzed the relation between baseline characteristics and the 30-day incidence of death and the composite of death or myocardial (re)infarction in 9461 patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation enrolled in the PURSUIT trial [Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (eptifibatide) Therapy]. Variables examined included demographics, history, hemodynamic condition, and symptom duration. Risk models were created with multivariable logistic regression and validated by bootstrapping techniques. There was a 3.6% mortality rate and 11.4% infarction rate by 30 days. More than 20 significant predictors for mortality and for the composite end point were identified. The most important baseline determinants of death were age (adjusted χ 2 =95), heart rate (χ 2 =32), systolic blood pressure (χ 2 =20), ST-segment depression (χ 2 =20), signs of heart failure (χ 2 =18), and cardiac enzymes (χ 2 =15). Determinants of mortality were generally also predictive of death or myocardial (re)infarction. Differences were observed, however, in the relative prognostic importance of predictive variables for mortality alone or the composite end point; for example, sex was a more important determinant of the composite end point (χ 2 =21) than of death alone (χ 2 =10). The accuracy of the prediction of the composite end point was less than that of mortality (C-index 0.67 versus 0.81). Conclusions —The occurrence of adverse events after presentation with acute coronary syndromes is affected by multiple factors. These factors should be considered in the clinical decision-making process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The importance of selenium to human health
Rayman, M. P. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02490-9 · Cited by 4,163
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., Casey, D. E., Ganiats, T. G., Holmes, D. R., Jaffe, A. S., Jneid, H., Kelly, R. F., Kontos, M. C., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 · Cited by 3,595
Amsterdam, E. A., Wenger, N. K., Brindis, R. G., Casey, D. E., Ganiats, T. G., Holmes, D. R., Jaffe, A. S., Jneid, H., Kelly, R. F., Kontos, M. C., et al. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000134 · Cited by 1,059
Bootstrap Methods for Developing Predictive Models
Austin, P. C., & Tu, J. V. (2004) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/0003130043277 · Cited by 622
JCS 2018 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Kimura, K., Kimura, T., Ishihara, M., Nakagawa, Y., Nakao, K., Miyauchi, K., Sakamoto, T., Tsujita, K., Hagiwara, N., Miyazaki, S., et al. (2019) · Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/circj.cj-19-0133 · Cited by 565
Mahaffey, K. W., Wojdyla, D. M., Carroll, K., Becker, R. C., Storey, R. F., Angiolillo, D. J., Held, C., Cannon, C. P., James, S., Pieper, K. S., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.047498 · Cited by 434
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boersma, E., Pieper, K. S., Steyerberg, E. W., Wilcox, R. G., Chang, W.-C., Lee, K. L., Akkerhuis, K. M., Harrington, R. A., Deckers, J. W., Armstrong, P. W., Lincoff, A. M., Califf, R. M., Topol, E. J., & Simoons, M. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-06-06
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2557-2567
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2048456880
- Cited by
- 963
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.