Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 963

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation: Results From an International Trial of 9461 Patients

Open access
Boersma, Eric, Pieper, Karen S., Steyerberg, Ewout W., Wilcox, Robert G., Chang, Wei-Ching, Lee, Kerry L., Akkerhuis, K. Martijn, Harrington, Robert A., Deckers, Jaap W., Armstrong, Paul W., Lincoff, A. Michael, Califf, Robert M., Topol, Eric J., Simoons, Maarten L.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Appropriate treatment policies should include an accurate estimate of a patient’s baseline risk. Risk modeling to date has been underutilized in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Methods and Results —We analyzed the relation between baseline characteristics and the 30-day incidence of death and the composite of death or myocardial (re)infarction in 9461 patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation enrolled in the PURSUIT trial [Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (eptifibatide) Therapy]. Variables examined included demographics, history, hemodynamic condition, and symptom duration. Risk models were created with multivariable logistic regression and validated by bootstrapping techniques. There was a 3.6% mortality rate and 11.4% infarction rate by 30 days. More than 20 significant predictors for mortality and for the composite end point were identified. The most important baseline determinants of death were age (adjusted χ 2 =95), heart rate (χ 2 =32), systolic blood pressure (χ 2 =20), ST-segment depression (χ 2 =20), signs of heart failure (χ 2 =18), and cardiac enzymes (χ 2 =15). Determinants of mortality were generally also predictive of death or myocardial (re)infarction. Differences were observed, however, in the relative prognostic importance of predictive variables for mortality alone or the composite end point; for example, sex was a more important determinant of the composite end point (χ 2 =21) than of death alone (χ 2 =10). The accuracy of the prediction of the composite end point was less than that of mortality (C-index 0.67 versus 0.81). Conclusions —The occurrence of adverse events after presentation with acute coronary syndromes is affected by multiple factors. These factors should be considered in the clinical decision-making process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.101.22.2557

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Boersma, E., Pieper, K. S., Steyerberg, E. W., Wilcox, R. G., Chang, W.-C., Lee, K. L., Akkerhuis, K. M., Harrington, R. A., Deckers, J. W., Armstrong, P. W., Lincoff, A. M., Califf, R. M., Topol, E. J., & Simoons, M. L.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-06-06
Volume
101
Issue
22
Pages
2557-2567
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2048456880
Cited by
963
References
0
FWCI
28.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.