The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local Pulse Pressure and Regression of Arterial Wall Hypertrophy During Long-Term Antihypertensive Treatment
Open accessAbstract
Background —Local pulse pressure (PP) is an independent determinant of carotid artery wall thickness, stronger than mean blood pressure (BP). The present study was designed to assess whether a β-adrenoceptor antagonist–based or an ACE inhibitor–based treatment was able to reduce carotid artery wall hypertrophy through a reduction in carotid PP rather than by lowering mean BP and whether the influence of local PP reduction could also be detected at the site of a muscular artery, the radial artery. Methods and Results —Ninety-eight essential hypertensive patients were randomized to 9 months of double-blind treatment with either celiprolol or enalapril. Arterial parameters were determined with high-resolution echo-tracking systems. PP was measured locally with applanation tonometry and independently of mean BP. After 9 months of treatment, mean BP, carotid PP, and intimal-medial thickness (IMT) decreased significantly, with no difference between the 2 groups. The reduction in carotid PP but not in mean BP was a major independent determinant of the reduction in carotid IMT. Radial artery IMT and PP decreased significantly with both treatments. However, the reduction in radial artery IMT was not related to the changes in radial artery PP. Conclusions —The regression of carotid artery wall hypertrophy during long-term antihypertensive treatment was dependent on the reduction in local PP rather than on the lowering of mean BP. The effect of PP lowering on IMT reduction was observed at the site of an elastic artery but not at the site of a muscular artery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications
Laurent, S., Cockcroft, J., Van Bortel, L., Boutouyrie, P., Giannattasio, C., Hayoz, D., Pannier, B., Vlachopoulos, C., Wilkinson, I., Struijker-Boudier, H., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 · Cited by 6,077
Self-citationMancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Self-citationMancia, G., Laurent, S., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambrosioni, E., Burnier, M., Caulfield, M. J., Cifkova, R., Clément, D., Coca, A., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e328333146d · Cited by 1,643
Self-citationMancia, G., Laurent, S., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambrosioni, E., Burnier, M., Caulfield, M. J., Cifkova, R., Clément, D., Coca, A., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2009) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.3109/08037050903450468 · Cited by 894
Self-citationPulse pressure—a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance
Dart, A. M., & Kingwell, B. A. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01108-1 · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Boutouyrie, P., Bussy, C., Hayoz, D., Hengstler, J., Dartois, N., Laloux, B., Brunner, H., & Laurent, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-06-06
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2601-2606
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1992281996
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Pulse Pressure and Regression of Arterial Wall Hypertrophy During Long-Term Antihypertensive Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.22.2601
- The paper
- Boutouyrie, P., Bussy, C., Hayoz, D., Hengstler, J., Dartois, N., Laloux, B., Brunner, H., & Laurent, S. (2000). Local Pulse Pressure and Regression of Arterial Wall Hypertrophy During Long-Term Antihypertensive Treatment. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.22.2601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.