Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical and Therapeutic Profile of Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes Who Do Not Have Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Open access
Roe, Matthew T., Harrington, Robert A., Prosper, Danielle M., Pieper, Karen S., Bhatt, Deepak L., Lincoff, A. Michael, Simoons, Maarten L., Akkerhuis, Martijn, Ohman, E. Magnus, Kitt, Michael M., Vahanian, Alec, Ruzyllo, Witold, Karsch, Karl, Califf, Robert M., Topol, Eric J.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —A proportion of patients who present with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are found to have insignificant coronary artery disease (CAD) during coronary angiography, but these patients have not been well characterized. Methods and Results —Of the 5767 patients with non–ST-segment elevation ACS who were enrolled in the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and who underwent in-hospital angiography, 88% had significant CAD (any stenosis >50%), 6% had mild CAD (any stenosis >0% to ≤50%), and 6% had no CAD (no stenosis identified). The frequency of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30 days was reduced with eptifibatide treatment in patients with significant CAD (18.3% versus 15.6% for placebo, P =0.006) but not in those with mild CAD (6.6% versus 5.4%, P =0.62) and with no CAD (3.0% versus 1.2%, P =0.28). We identified independent baseline predictors of insignificant CAD (mild or no CAD) and used them to develop a simple predictive nomogram of the probability of insignificant CAD for use at hospital presentation. This nomogram was validated in a separate population of patients with non–ST-segment elevation ACS. Conclusions —Patients with suspected ACS found to have insignificant CAD have a low risk of adverse outcomes, do not appear to benefit from treatment with eptifibatide, and can be predicted with a simple nomogram drawn from baseline characteristics. Because patients with significant CAD appear to have an enhanced benefit from eptifibatide treatment, the predictive nomogram developed can be used to determine indications for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1101

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Roe, M. T., Harrington, R. A., Prosper, D. M., Pieper, K. S., Bhatt, D. L., Lincoff, A. M., Simoons, M. L., Akkerhuis, M., Ohman, E. M., Kitt, M. M., Vahanian, A., Ruzyllo, W., Karsch, K., Califf, R. M., & Topol, E. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-09-05
Volume
102
Issue
10
Pages
1101-1106
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1966225200
Cited by
220
References
0
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Therapeutic Profile of Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes Who Do Not Have Significant Coronary Artery Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1101
The paper
Roe, M. T., Harrington, R. A., Prosper, D. M., Pieper, K. S., Bhatt, D. L., Lincoff, A. M., Simoons, M. L., Akkerhuis, M., Ohman, E. M., Kitt, M. M., Vahanian, A., Ruzyllo, W., Karsch, K., Califf, R. M., & Topol, E. J. (2000). Clinical and Therapeutic Profile of Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndromes Who Do Not Have Significant Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.