The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation After Conventional and Beating Heart Coronary Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study
Open accessAbstract
Background —Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the morbidity of CABG. The pathophysiology is uncertain, and its prevention remains suboptimal. This prospective, randomized study was designed to define the role of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest in the pathogenesis of this complication. Methods and Results —Two hundred patients were prospectively randomized to (1) on-pump conventional surgery [(100 patients, 79 men, mean age 63 (40 to 77) years)] with normothermic CPB and cardioplegic arrest of the heart or (2) off-pump surgery [(100 patients, 82 men, mean age 63 (38 to 86) years)] on the beating heart. Heart rate and rhythm were continuously monitored with an automated arrhythmia detector during the first 72 hours after surgery. Thereafter, routine clinical observation was performed and continuous monitoring restarted in the case of arrhythmia. The association of perioperative factors with AF was investigated by univariate analysis. Significant variables were then included into a stepwise logistic regression model to ascertain their independent influence on the occurrence of AF. There were no significant baseline differences between groups. Thirty-nine patients in the on-pump group and 8 patients in the off-pump group had postoperative sustained AF ( P =0.001). Univariate analysis showed that CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest, postoperative inotropic support, intubation time, chest infection, and hospital length of stay were predictors of AF (all P <0.05). However, stepwise multivariate regression analysis identified CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest as the only independent predictor of postoperative AF (OR 7.4; CI 3.4 to 17.9). Conclusions —CPB inclusive of cardioplegic arrest is the main independent predictor of postoperative AF in patients undergoing coronary revascularization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Angelini, G. D., Taylor, F. C., Reeves, B. C., & Ascione, R. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08216-8 · Cited by 566
Self-citationGaudino, M., Andreotti, F., Zamparelli, R., Di Castelnuovo, A., Nasso, G., Burzotta, F., Iacoviello, L., Donati, M. B., Schiavello, R., Maseri, A., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000087441.48566.0d · Cited by 454
Post-operative atrial fibrillation: a maze of mechanisms
Maesen, B., Nijs, J., Maessen, J., Allessie, M., & Schotten, U. (2012) · Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eur208 · Cited by 451
Ishii, Y., Schuessler, R. B., Gaynor, S. L., Yamada, K., Fu, A. S., Boineau, J. P., & Damiano, R. J. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.475194 · Cited by 319
Hannan, E. L., Wu, C., Smith, C. R., Higgins, R. S. D., Carlson, R. E., Culliford, A. T., Gold, J. P., & Jones, R. H. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.675595 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Ascione, R., Caputo, M., Calori, G., Lloyd, C. T., Underwood, M. J., & Angelini, G. D.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-09-26
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1530-1535
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2917466351
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation After Conventional and Beating Heart Coronary Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1530
- The paper
- Ascione, R., Caputo, M., Calori, G., Lloyd, C. T., Underwood, M. J., & Angelini, G. D. (2000). Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation After Conventional and Beating Heart Coronary Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.13.1530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.