The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Independent Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Confirmed Pulmonary Embolism
Abstract
Background —Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is a sensitive and specific marker, allowing the detection of even minor myocardial cell injury. In patients with severe pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial ischemia may lead to progressive right ventricular dysfunction. It was therefore the purpose of this study to test the presence of cTnT and its prognostic implications in patients with confirmed PE. Methods and Results —Fifty-six consecutive patients with confirmed PE were enrolled in this prospective study. PE was confirmed by pulmonary angiography, lung scan, or echocardiography and subsidiary analyses. Severity of PE was assessed by a clinical scoring system, and cTnT was measured within 12 hours after admission. cTnT was elevated (≥0.1 μg/L) in 18 (32%) patients with massive and moderate PE but not in patients with small PE. In-hospital death (odds ratio 29.6, 95% CI 3.3 to 265.3), prolonged hypotension and cardiogenic shock (odds ratio 11.4, 95% CI 2.1 to 63.4), and need for resuscitation (odds ratio 18.0, 95% CI 2.6 to 124.3) were more prevalent in patients with elevated cTnT. cTnT-positive patients more often needed inotropic support (odds ratio 37.6, 95% CI 5.8 to 245.6) and mechanical ventilation (odds ratio 78.8, 95% CI 9.5 to 653.2). After adjustment, cTnT remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 15.2, 95% CI 1.22 to 190.4). Conclusions —cTnT may improve risk stratification in patients with PE and may aid in the identification of patients in whom a more aggressive therapy may be warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism
Aujesky, D., Obrosky, D. S., Stone, R. A., Auble, T. E., Perrier, A., Cornuz, J., Roy, P.-M., & Fine, M. J. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200506-862oc · Cited by 1,303
Analytical Validation of a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Assay
Giannitsis, E., Kurz, K., Hallermayer, K., Jarausch, J., Jaffe, A. S., & Katus, H. A. (2010) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2009.132654 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationNeilan, T. G., Januzzi, J. L., Lee-Lewandrowski, E., Ton-Nu, T.-T., Yoerger, D. M., Jassal, D. S., Lewandrowski, K. B., Siegel, A. J., Marshall, J. E., Douglas, P. S., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.647461 · Cited by 519
Binder, L., Pieske, B., Olschewski, M., Geibel, A., Klostermann, B., Reiner, C., & Konstantinides, S. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.552216 · Cited by 304
COPD and PE: A Clinical Dilemma
Wood, K. (2008) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s1183 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Giannitsis, E., Müller-Bardorff, M., Kurowski, V., Weidtmann, B., Wiegand, U., Kampmann, M., & Katus, H. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-07-11
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-217
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2163414191
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Independent Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Confirmed Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.2.211
- The paper
- Giannitsis, E., Müller-Bardorff, M., Kurowski, V., Weidtmann, B., Wiegand, U., Kampmann, M., & Katus, H. A. (2000). Independent Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin T in Patients With Confirmed Pulmonary Embolism. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.2.211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.