Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 457

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical and Genetic Heterogeneity of Right Bundle Branch Block and ST-Segment Elevation Syndrome: A Prospective Evaluation of 52 Families

Open access
Priori, Silvia G., Napolitano, Carlo, Gasparini, Maurizio, Pappone, Carlo, Della Bella, Paolo, Brignole, Michele, Giordano, Umberto, Giovannini, Tiziana, Menozzi, Carlo, Bloise, Raffaella, Crotti, Lia, Terreni, Liana, Schwartz, Peter J.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The ECG pattern of right bundle branch block and ST-segment elevation in leads V 1 to V 3 (Brugada syndrome) is associated with high risk of sudden death in patients with a normal heart. Current management and prognosis are based on a single study suggesting a high mortality risk within 3 years for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients alike. As a consequence, aggressive management (implantable cardioverter defibrillator) is recommended for both groups. Methods and Results —Sixty patients (45 males aged 40±15 years) with the typical ECG pattern were clinically evaluated. Events at follow-up were analyzed for patients with at least one episode of aborted sudden death or syncope of unknown origin before recognition of the syndrome (30 symptomatic patients) and for patients without previous history of events (30 asymptomatic patients). Prevalence of mutations of the cardiac sodium channel was 15%, demonstrating genetic heterogeneity. During a mean follow-up of 33±38 months, ventricular fibrillation occurred in 5 (16%) of 30 symptomatic patients and in none of the 30 asymptomatic patients. Programmed electrical stimulation was of limited value in identifying patients at risk (positive predictive value 50%, negative predictive value 46%). Pharmacological challenge with sodium channel blockers was unable to unmask most silent gene carriers (positive predictive value 35%). Conclusions —At variance with current views, asymptomatic patients are at lower risk for sudden death. Programmed electrical stimulation identifies only a fraction of individuals at risk, and sodium channel blockade fails to unmask most silent gene carriers. This novel evidence mandates a reappraisal of therapeutic management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.20.2509

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 457

Metadata

Authors
Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Gasparini, M., Pappone, C., Della Bella, P., Brignole, M., Giordano, U., Giovannini, T., Menozzi, C., Bloise, R., Crotti, L., Terreni, L., & Schwartz, P. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-11-14
Volume
102
Issue
20
Pages
2509-2515
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2013880873
Cited by
457
References
0
FWCI
20.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and Genetic Heterogeneity of Right Bundle Branch Block and ST-Segment Elevation Syndrome: A Prospective Evaluation of 52 Families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.20.2509
The paper
Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Gasparini, M., Pappone, C., Della Bella, P., Brignole, M., Giordano, U., Giovannini, T., Menozzi, C., Bloise, R., Crotti, L., Terreni, L., & Schwartz, P. J. (2000). Clinical and Genetic Heterogeneity of Right Bundle Branch Block and ST-Segment Elevation Syndrome: A Prospective Evaluation of 52 Families. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.20.2509

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.