Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 876

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Open access
Nagaya, Noritoshi, Nishikimi, Toshio, Uematsu, Masaaki, Satoh, Toru, Kyotani, Shingo, Sakamaki, Fumio, Kakishita, Mikio, Fukushima, Kengo, Okano, Yoshiaki, Nakanishi, Norifumi, Miyatake, Kunio, Kangawa, Kenji·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level increases in proportion to the degree of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension. We sought to assess the prognostic significance of plasma BNP in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). Methods and Results —Plasma BNP was measured in 60 patients with PPH at diagnostic catheterization, together with atrial natriuretic peptide, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. Measurements were repeated in 53 patients after a mean follow-up period of 3 months. Forty-nine of the patients received intravenous or oral prostacyclin. During a mean follow-up period of 24 months, 18 patients died of cardiopulmonary causes. According to multivariate analysis, baseline plasma BNP was an independent predictor of mortality. Patients with a supramedian level of baseline BNP (≥150 pg/mL) had a significantly lower survival rate than those with an inframedian level, according to Kaplan-Meier survival curves ( P <0.05). Plasma BNP in survivors decreased significantly during the follow-up (217±38 to 149±30 pg/mL, P <0.05), whereas that in nonsurvivors increased (365±77 to 544±68 pg/mL, P <0.05). Thus, survival was strikingly worse for patients with a supramedian value of follow-up BNP (≥180 pg/mL) than for those with an inframedian value ( P <0.0001). Conclusions —A high level of plasma BNP, and in particular, a further increase in plasma BNP during follow-up, may have a strong, independent association with increased mortality rates in patients with PPH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.8.865

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 876

Metadata

Authors
Nagaya, N., Nishikimi, T., Uematsu, M., Satoh, T., Kyotani, S., Sakamaki, F., Kakishita, M., Fukushima, K., Okano, Y., Nakanishi, N., Miyatake, K., & Kangawa, K.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-08-22
Volume
102
Issue
8
Pages
865-870
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2109805789
Cited by
876
References
0
FWCI
15.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.102.8.865
The paper
Nagaya, N., Nishikimi, T., Uematsu, M., Satoh, T., Kyotani, S., Sakamaki, F., Kakishita, M., Fukushima, K., Okano, Y., Nakanishi, N., Miyatake, K., & Kangawa, K. (2000). Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.8.865

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.