The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Instability and Triangulation of the Action Potential Predict Serious Proarrhythmia, but Action Potential Duration Prolongation Is Antiarrhythmic
Abstract
Background—Prolongation of action potential duration (APD) is considered a major antiarrhythmic mechanism (class 2I), but paradoxically, it frequently is also proarrhythmic (torsade de pointes). Methods and Results—The cardiac electrophysiological effects of 702 chemicals (class 2I or HERG channel block) were studied in 1071 rabbit Langendorff-perfused hearts. Temporal instability of APD, triangulation (duration of phase 3 repolarization), reverse use-dependence, and induction of ectopic beats were measured. Instability, triangulation, and reverse use-dependence were found to be important determinants of proarrhythmia. Agents that lengthened the APD by >50 ms, with induction of instability, triangulation, and reverse use-dependence (n=59), induced proarrhythmia (primarily polymorphic ventricular tachycardia); in their absence (n=19), the same prolongation of APD induced no proarrhythmia but significant antiarrhythmia (P<0.001). Shortening of APD, when accompanied by instability and triangulation, was also markedly proarrhythmic (primarily monomorphic ventricular tachycardia). In experiments in which instability and triangulation were present, proarrhythmia declined with prolongation of APD, but this effect was not large enough to become antiarrhythmic. Only with agents without instability did prolongation of APD become antiarrhythmic. For 20 selected compounds, it was shown that instability of APD and triangulation observed in vitro were strong predictors of in vivo proarrhythmia (torsade de pointes). Conclusions—Lengthening of APD without instability or triangulation is not proarrhythmic but rather antiarrhythmic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing
Gintant, G., Sager, P. T., & Stockbridge, N. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.34 · Cited by 407
Crude Oil Impairs Cardiac Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Fish
Brette, F., Machado, B., Cros, C., Incardona, J. P., Scholz, N. L., & Block, B. A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1242747 · Cited by 310
Recanatini, M., Poluzzi, E., Masetti, M., Cavalli, A., & De Ponti, F. (2005) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.20019 · Cited by 285
Hinterseer, M., Thomsen, M. B., Beckmann, B.-M., Pfeufer, A., Schimpf, R., Wichmann, H.-E., Steinbeck, G., Vos, M. A., & Kaab, S. (2007) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm586 · Cited by 126
Sarkar, A. X., & Sobie, E. A. (2011) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.023 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Hondeghem, L. M., Carlsson, L., & Duker, G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2001-04-17
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2004-2013
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2065572778
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instability and Triangulation of the Action Potential Predict Serious Proarrhythmia, but Action Potential Duration Prolongation Is Antiarrhythmic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.103.15.2004
- The paper
- Hondeghem, L. M., Carlsson, L., & Duker, G. (2001). Instability and Triangulation of the Action Potential Predict Serious Proarrhythmia, but Action Potential Duration Prolongation Is Antiarrhythmic. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.15.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.