Significance of the Sinus-Node Recovery Time

Abstract

The phenomenon of postpacing depression of cardiac pacemakers was utilized to evaluate the sinus-node function in 56 patients by analyzing the sinus-node recovery time (SRT), that is, the interval between the last paced P wave and the following sinus P wave. Corrected SRT (CSRT) is defined as the recovery interval in excess of the sinus cycle (SRT — sinus cycle length). The SRT was measured following sinus-node suppression by (1) isolated premature beats (PABs) and (2) atrial pacing (AP) at rates of 100 to 140/min for periods of 2 to 5 min at each level. Twenty-eight patients had normal heart rates (group A), and 28 patients had sinus bradycardia (SB; group B). Ten of the 28 patients with SB were restudied after receiving atropine (2 mg intravenously). The CSRT with PABs was similar in both group A and group B patients and remained essentially unchanged after atropine despite a decrease in sinus cycle length. The phenomenon of interpolated PABs was demonstrated in seven of the 56 patients. In 27 of the 28 patients with normal heart rates (group A), the CSRT with AP ranged from 110 to 525 msec and was essentially independent of the rate and duration of AP. In the remaining one patient of group A, despite a normal heart rate, the CSRT was prolonged (1810 msec) and directly dependent on the rate and duration of AP. In 12 of the 28 patients with SB, the CSRT was comparable to that in group A (≦525 msec). In the remaining 16 patients with SB (group B), the CSRT ranged from 560 to 3740 msec and was usually directly proportional to the rate and duration of AP. After atropine in most of the patients with a prolonged CSRT, the CSRT remained abnormal whereas in others junctional escape beats appeared first, followed eventually by normal sinus rhythm. In a single patient with SB and an abnormal CSRT, restudy 7½ months later again showed a prolonged CSRT indicating the reproducibility of the measurement. The CSRT with AP provides a potentially useful clinical means of assessing the sinus-node function and thereby aids in the diagnosis of the "sick sinus syndrome." It is stressed that AP was found to be more reliable than PABs in eliciting an abnormal response. Furthermore, a normal sinus (atrial) rate does not necessarily provide assurance of a normal sinus-node response to AP, that is, normal sinus-node function.