The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques.
Open accessAbstract
Five different algorithms for determining left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes from two-dimensional echocardiographic examination (TDE) were compared with standard methods for obtaining EF and volume from x-ray cineangiography (cine) and EF from radionuclide ventriculography (RVG) in 35 patients. Although all methods correlated positively, the degree of correlation varied with the algorithm used. For EF determination, TDE algorithms (especially those using multiple planes of section) were superior to unidimensional algorithms commonly used with M-mode echocardiography. The best algorithm (modified Simpson's rule) correlated well enough with cine EF (r = 0.78; SEE 0.097) and RVG EF (r = 0.75; SEE 0.087) to make clinically useful estimates. TDE volumes also correlated meaningfully with cine end-diastolic and end-systole volumes (r = 084; n = 70) but were associated with a large standard error of the estimate (43 ml) and offered less advantage over unidimensional volume estimates. Quantitative application of TDE appears to be a useful noninvasive method of evaluating LVEF, but is not as useful for estimating LV volumes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Davies, M., Hobbs, F., Davis, R., Kenkre, J., Roalfe, A., Hare, R., Wosornu, D., & Lancashire, R. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05620-3 · Cited by 657
Boonman-de Winter, L. J. M., Rutten, F. H., Cramer, M. J. M., Landman, M. J., Liem, A. H., Rutten, G. E. H. M., & Hoes, A. W. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2579-0 · Cited by 343
Sympathetic and reflex alterations in systo-diastolic and systolic hypertension of the elderly
Grassi, G., Seravalle, G., Bertinieri, G., Turri, C., DellʼOro, R., Stella, M. L., & Mancia, G. (2000) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/00004872-200018050-00012 · Cited by 99
Bertaglia, E., Zoppo, F., Bonso, A., Proclemer, A., Verlato, R., Corò, L., Mantovan, R., D’Este, D., Zerbo, F., & Pascotto, P. (2004) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heart.90.1.59 · Cited by 88
Van Beek, M. H. C. T., Zuidersma, M., Lappenschaar, M., Pop, G., Roest, A. M., Van Balkom, A. J. L. M., Speckens, A. E. M., & Oude Voshaar, R. C. (2016) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.174870 · Cited by 76
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Cardiac Performance
DiSessa, T. G., & Friedman, W. F. (1983) · Cardiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8651(18)30791-4 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Folland, E. D., Parisi, A. F., Moynihan, P. F., Jones, D. R., Feldman, C. L., & Tow, D. E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1979-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 760-766
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2048309569
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.