The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms.
Abstract
SUMMARY The relationship between the shape of the ascending aortic pressure wave form and aortic input impedance was studied in 18 patients who underwent elective cardiac catheterization but in whom no heart dis-ease was found. Ascending aortic flow velocity and pressure were simultaneously recorded from a multisensor catheter with an electromagnetic velocity probe and a pressure sensor mounted at the same location. Another pressure sensor at the catheter tip provided left ventricular pressure or a second aortic pressure to determine pulse-wave velocity. Fick cardiac outputs were used to scale the velocity signal to instantaneous volumetric flow. Input impedance was calculated from 10 harmonics of aortic pressure and flow. For each patient, im-pedance moduli and phases from a minimum of 15 beats during a steady state were averaged. Peripheral resistance was 1137 ± 39 dyn-sec-cm ' (4 SEM) and characteristic impedance was 47 4 4 dyn-sec-cm-; pulse-wave velocity was 6.68 ± 0.32 m-sec-'. In all patients, a well-defined systolic inflection point divided the aortic pressure wave form into an early and late systolic phase. The patients were classified into three groups: group A (n = 7) patients whose late systolic pressure exceeded early systolic pressure; group B (n = 7) pa-tients whose early and late systolic pressures were nearly equal; group C (n = 4)- patients whose early systolic pressure exceeded late systolic pressure. Group A and B patients all demonstrated oscillations of the impedance moduli about the characteristic impedance. Group C patients demonstrated flatter impedance spec-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Arterial Stiffness and Cardiovascular Events: The Framingham Heart Study
Mitchell, G. F., Hwang, S.-J., Vasan, R. S., Larson, M. G., Pencina, M. J., Hamburg, N. M., Vita, J. A., Levy, D., & Benjamin, E. J. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.886655 · Cited by 2,225
KARAMANOGLU, M., O'ROURKE, M. F., AVOLIO, A. P., & KELLY, R. P. (1993) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/14.2.160 · Cited by 873
Arterial wave reflections and survival in end-stage renal failure
London, G. M., Blacher, J., Pannier, B., Guérin, A. P., Marchais, S. J., & Safar, M. E. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.38.3.434 · Cited by 853
Pulse pressure—a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance
Dart, A. M., & Kingwell, B. A. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01108-1 · Cited by 836
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Metadata
- Authors
- Murgo, J. P., Westerhof, N., Giolma, J. P., & Altobelli, S. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1980-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-116
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1985023991
- Cited by
- 1,014
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.62.1.105
- The paper
- Murgo, J. P., Westerhof, N., Giolma, J. P., & Altobelli, S. A. (1980). Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.62.1.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.