The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis.
Abstract
The static elastic properties of arterial tree (abdominal aorta and common carotid artery) were studied in 19 normal subjects and in 49 patients with myocardial infarction with an ultrasonic phase-locked echo-tracking system that allows continuous transcutaneous measurement of the arterial diameter. The stiffness index beta, which represented the mechanical properties in the arterial wall, was calculated from the relation between systemic blood pressure and the diameter of the artery. Patients with myocardial infarction underwent coronary angiography in their convalescent period to determine involved vessels. In 11 patients, coronary artery was patent; 15 patients had one-vessel disease, 12 had two-vessel disease, and the remaining 11 patients had three-vessel disease. In normal subjects, increasing age was associated with an increase in arterial stiffness. An average value of the stiffness index of the abdominal aorta was 8.58 +/- 3.02 (mean +/- SD) and that of common carotid artery was 9.17 +/- 2.22. In patients with three-vessel disease, these values were significantly higher (22.37 +/- 4.29 in abdominal aorta and 13.17 +/- 4.56 in common carotid artery) than those in normal subjects. Stiffness index of patients with two- or one-vessel disease was also increased but lower than those in patients with three-vessel disease (p less than 0.05). Forty-four of 49 patients with infarction had an arterial stiffness index of abdominal aorta higher than the 95% confidence limits of the normal data (p less than 0.05). Twenty-eight patients were outside the nomogram of common carotid artery (p less than 0.05). The mechanical properties of these elastic arteries provided sufficiently reliable information on changes caused by atherosclerosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, S., Boutouyrie, P., Asmar, R., Gautier, I., Laloux, B., Guize, L., Ducimetiere, P., & Benetos, A. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236 · Cited by 3,856
Impact of Aortic Stiffness on Survival in End-Stage Renal Disease
Blacher, J., Guerin, A. P., Pannier, B., Marchais, S. J., Safar, M. E., & London, G. M. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2434 · Cited by 2,138
Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients
Blacher, J., Asmar, R., Djane, S., London, G. M., & Safar, M. E. (1999) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.33.5.1111 · Cited by 1,493
Association Between Arterial Stiffness and Atherosclerosis: The Rotterdam Study
van Popele, N. M., Grobbee, D. E., Bots, M. L., Asmar, R., Topouchian, J., Reneman, R. S., Hoeks, A. P. G., van der Kuip, D. A. M., Hofman, A., & Witteman, J. C. M. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.32.2.454 · Cited by 1,142
Aging, Habitual Exercise, and Dynamic Arterial Compliance
Tanaka, H., Dinenno, F. A., Monahan, K. D., Clevenger, C. M., DeSouza, C. A., & Seals, D. R. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.11.1270 · Cited by 1,118
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirai, T., Sasayama, S., Kawasaki, T., & Yagi, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-86
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1623505186
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.80.1.78
- The paper
- Hirai, T., Sasayama, S., Kawasaki, T., & Yagi, S. (1989). Stiffness of systemic arteries in patients with myocardial infarction. A noninvasive method to predict severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.80.1.78
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.