The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrocardiographic quantitation of ventricular repolarization.
Abstract
Quantification of the electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization involving the T-U wave complex is usually performed with reference to the axis of the T wave and the QT interval duration. A novel quantitative approach to improve the description of ventricular repolarization was applied to the digitized electrocardiograms of 423 normal subjects. Six electrocardiographic repolarization characteristics were identified: duration, rate, area, symmetry, late phenomena, and interlead heterogeneity. A computer algorithm was designed to automatically interpret the electrocardiographic repolarization segment and measure 11 variables that quantified these repolarization characteristics. The application of redundancy-reduction techniques selected a final set of seven variables that were used in the statistical analysis. The QT interval, which was included in the initial group of variables, was replaced by the time interval between S wave offset and T wave maximum. All selected electrocardiographic variables were independent of age (r2 less than 0.11) and body surface area (r2 less than 0.03); all except the early duration variable were heart rate- and QT interval-independent (r2 less than 0.2, r2 less than 0.13, respectively; and most were uncorrelated to each other. A comparison of repolarization characteristics by gender revealed that repolarization duration was significantly more prolonged (p less than 0.0001) in women than in men. This multidimensional quantitative approach conveys a new and more complete description of the repolarization process and provides an electrocardiographic repolarization database in normal subjects as a reference standard for identifying patients with disordered repolarization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simplified calculation of body surface area
(1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198710223171717 · Cited by 3,238
Cited by
Mechanistic Pathways of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease
Regitz-Zagrosek, V., & Kararigas, G. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00021.2015 · Cited by 732
Locati, E. H., Zareba, W., Moss, A. J., Schwartz, P. J., Vincent, G. M., Lehmann, M. H., Towbin, J. A., Priori, S. G., Napolitano, C., Robinson, J. L., et al. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.22.2237 · Cited by 493
Self-citationDiurnal pattern of QTc interval: How long is prolonged?
Molnar, J., Zhang, F., Weiss, J., Ehlert, F. A., & Rosenthal, J. E. (1996) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00426-2 · Cited by 312
Risk of Aborted Cardiac Arrest or Sudden Cardiac Death During Adolescence in the Long-QT Syndrome
Hobbs, J. B., Peterson, D. R., Moss, A. J., McNitt, S., Zareba, W., Goldenberg, I., Qi, M., Robinson, J. L., Sauer, A. J., Ackerman, M. J., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.10.1249 · Cited by 313
Self-citationCharlton, P. H., Mariscal Harana, J., Vennin, S., Li, Y., Chowienczyk, P., & Alastruey, J. (2019) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00218.2019 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Merri, M., Benhorin, J., Alberti, M., Locati, E., & Moss, A. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1301-1308
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2075872682
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrocardiographic quantitation of ventricular repolarization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1301
- The paper
- Merri, M., Benhorin, J., Alberti, M., Locati, E., & Moss, A. J. (1989). Electrocardiographic quantitation of ventricular repolarization. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.