The DOI matches its Crossref record.
QTc prolongation measured by standard 12-lead electrocardiography is an independent risk factor for sudden death due to cardiac arrest.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: QTc prolongation has been implicated as a risk factor for sudden death; however, a controversy exists over its significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Rotterdam QT Project, 6,693 consecutive patients who underwent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography were followed up for 2 years; of these, 245 patients died suddenly. A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram and clinical data at the time of 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography were collected for all patients who died suddenly and for a random sample of 467 patients from the study cohort. In all patients without an intraventricular conduction defect (176 patients who died suddenly and 390 patients from the sample), QT interval duration was measured in leads I, II, and III and corrected for heart rate with Bazett's formula (QTc). In patients without evidence of cardiac dysfunction (history of symptoms of pump failure or an ejection fraction less than 40%), QTc of more than 440 msec was associated with a 2.3 times higher risk for sudden death compared with a QTc of 440 msec or less (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 3.9). In contrast, in patients with evidence of cardiac dysfunction, the relative risk of QTc prolongation was 1.0 (0.5, 1.9). Adjustment for age, gender, history of myocardial infarction, heart rate, and the use of drugs did not alter these relative risks. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that in patients without intraventricular conduction defects and cardiac dysfunction, QTc prolongation measured from the standard electrocardiogram is a risk factor for sudden death independent of age, history of myocardial infarction, heart rate, and drug use. In patients with cardiac dysfunction, QTc duration is not related to the risk for sudden death.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prolonged QTc Interval and Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in a Population of Older Adults
Straus, S. M. J. M., Kors, J. A., De Bruin, M. L., van der Hooft, C. S., Hofman, A., Heeringa, J., Deckers, J. W., Kingma, J. H., Sturkenboom, M. C. J. M., Stricker, B. H. C., et al. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.067 · Cited by 833
Terfenadine-Ketoconazole Interaction: Pharmacokinetic and Electrocardiographic Consequences
Honig, P. K. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500120051025 · Cited by 664
QTc-interval abnormalities and psychotropic drug therapy in psychiatric patients
Reilly, J., Ayis, S., Ferrier, I., Jones, S., & Thomas, S. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02035-3 · Cited by 602
Diurnal pattern of QTc interval: How long is prolonged?
Molnar, J., Zhang, F., Weiss, J., Ehlert, F. A., & Rosenthal, J. E. (1996) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(95)00426-2 · Cited by 312
Stramba-Badiale, M., Locati, E. H., Martinelli, A., Courville, J., & Schwartz, P. J. (1997) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015357 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Algra, A., Tijssen, J. G., Roelandt, J. R., Pool, J., & Lubsen, J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1888-1894
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1991290782
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QTc prolongation measured by standard 12-lead electrocardiography is an independent risk factor for sudden death due to cardiac arrest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.83.6.1888
- The paper
- Algra, A., Tijssen, J. G., Roelandt, J. R., Pool, J., & Lubsen, J. (1991). QTc prolongation measured by standard 12-lead electrocardiography is an independent risk factor for sudden death due to cardiac arrest. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.83.6.1888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.