The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A prospective regional study was conducted to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). A prediction rule was developed and validated based on the data collected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 3,055 patients were collected from five clinical centers between July 1, 1987, and April 15, 1989. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality. A prediction rule was developed on a training set of data and validated on an independent test set. The metric used to assess the performance of the prediction rule was the area under the relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Variables used to construct the regression model of in-hospital mortality included age, sex, body surface area, presence of comorbid disease, history of CABG, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, ejection fraction score, and priority of surgery. The model significantly predicted the occurrence of in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC curve obtained from the training set of data was 0.74 (perfect, 1.0). The prediction rule performed well when used on a test set of data (area, 0.76). The correlation between observed and expected numbers of deaths was 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction rule described in this report was developed using regional data, uses only eight variables, has good performance characteristics, and is easily available to clinicians with access to a microcomputer or programmable calculator. This validated multivariate prediction rule would be useful both to calculate the risk of mortality for an individual patient and to contrast observed and expected mortality rates for an institution or a particular clinician.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems
Swets, J. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3287615 · Cited by 10,058
Kupper, L. L., Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290035 · Cited by 7,599
Judgment under uncertainty: List of contributors
Kahneman, D. J., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cited by 4,670
Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution
Kahneman, D. J., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cited by 4,670
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982) · Judgment under Uncertainty · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.002 · Cited by 3,643
Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods.
Mayer, L. S., Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Morgenstern, H. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288427 · Cited by 2,905
Cited by
Shahian, D. M., O'Brien, S. M., Filardo, G., Ferraris, V. A., Haan, C. K., Rich, J. B., Normand, S.-L. T., DeLong, E. R., Shewan, C. M., Dokholyan, R. S., et al. (2009) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.053 · Cited by 1,256
Ferraris, V. A., Ferraris, S. P., Saha, S. P., Hessel, E. A., Haan, C. K., Royston, B. D., Bridges, C. R., Higgins, R. S. D., Despotis, G., Brown, J. R., et al. (2007) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.099 · Cited by 964
2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., Bittl, J. A., Bridges, C. R., Byrne, J. G., Cigarroa, J. E., DiSesa, V. J., Hiratzka, L. F., Hutter, A. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009 · Cited by 820
Oxman, T. E., Freeman, D. H., & Manheimer, E. D. (1995) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-199501000-00002 · Cited by 525
Ambler, G., Omar, R. Z., & Royston, P. (2007) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280206074466 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connor, G. T., Plume, S. K., Olmstead, E. M., Coffin, L. H., Morton, J. R., Maloney, C. T., Nowicki, E. R., Levy, D. G., Tryzelaar, J. F., & Hernandez, F.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2110-2118
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2063507658
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.85.6.2110
- The paper
- O'Connor, G. T., Plume, S. K., Olmstead, E. M., Coffin, L. H., Morton, J. R., Maloney, C. T., Nowicki, E. R., Levy, D. G., Tryzelaar, J. F., & Hernandez, F. (1992). Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.85.6.2110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.