The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Central venous access is an essential part of patient management in many clinical settings and is usually achieved with a blinded, external landmark-guided technique. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an ultrasound technique can improve on the traditional method. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively evaluated an ultrasound-guided method in 302 patients undergoing internal jugular venous cannulation and compared the results with 302 patients in whom an external landmark-guided technique was used. Ultrasound was used exclusively in an additional 626 patients. Cannulation of the internal jugular vein was achieved in all patients (100%) using ultrasound and in 266 patients (88.1%) using the landmark-guided technique (p < 0.001). The vein was entered on the first attempt in 78% of patients using ultrasound and in 38% using the landmark technique (p < 0.001). Average access time (skin to vein) was 9.8 seconds (2-68 seconds) by the ultrasound approach and 44.5 seconds (2-1,000 seconds) by the landmark approach (p < 0.001). Using ultrasound, puncture of the carotid artery occurred in 1.7% of patients, brachial plexus irritation in 0.4%, and hematoma in 0.2%. In the external landmark group, puncture of the carotid artery occurred in 8.3% of patients (p < 0.001), brachial plexus irritation in 1.7% (p < 0.001), and hematoma in 3.3% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein significantly improves success rate, decreases access time, and reduces complication rate. These results suggest that this technique may be preferred in complicated cases or when access problems are anticipated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrasound Guidance Improves the Success Rate of Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation
Mallory, D. L., McGee, W. T., Shawker, T. H., Brenner, M., Bailey, K. R., Evans, R. G., Parker, M. M., Farmer, J. C., & Parillo, J. E. (1990) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.98.1.157 · Cited by 264
Cited by
Cooper, L. T., Baughman, K. L., Feldman, A. M., Frustaci, A., Jessup, M., Kuhl, U., Levine, G. N., Narula, J., Starling, R. C., Towbin, J., et al. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.186093 · Cited by 1,030
Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: A meta-analysis of the literature
Randolph, A. G., Cook, D. J., Gonzales, C. A., & Pribble, C. G. (1996) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020 · Cited by 852
International evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound-guided vascular access
Lamperti, M., Bodenham, A. R., Pittiruti, M., Blaivas, M., Augoustides, J. G., Elbarbary, M., Pirotte, T., Karakitsos, D., LeDonne, J., Doniger, S., et al. (2012) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2597-x · Cited by 834
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization
Brass, P., Hellmich, M., Kolodziej, L., Schick, G., & Smith, A. F. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006962.pub2 · Cited by 476
Costantino, T. G., Parikh, A. K., Satz, W. A., & Fojtik, J. P. (2005) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.026 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Denys, B. G., Uretsky, B. F., & Reddy, P. S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1557-1562
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2091639018
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.87.5.1557
- The paper
- Denys, B. G., Uretsky, B. F., & Reddy, P. S. (1993). Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.87.5.1557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.