The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia reentry circuits in chronic infarct scars can contain slow conduction zones, which are difficult to distinguish from bystander areas adjacent to the circuit during catheter mapping. This study developed criteria for identifying reentry circuit sites using computer simulations. These criteria then were tested during catheter mapping in humans to predict sites at which radiofrequency current application terminated ventricular tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: In computer simulations, effects of single stimuli and stimulus trains at sites in and adjacent to reentry circuits were analyzed. Entrainment with concealed fusion, defined as ventricular tachycardia entrainment with no change in QRS morphology, could occur during stimulation in reentry circuit common pathways and adjacent bystander sites. Pacing at reentry circuit common pathway sites, the stimulus to QRS (S-QRS) interval equals the electrogram to QRS interval (EG-QRS) during tachycardia. The postpacing interval from the last stimulus to the following electrogram equals the tachycardia cycle length. Pacing at bystander sites the S-QRS exceeds the EG-QRS interval when the conduction time from the bystander site to the circuit is short but may be less than or equal to the EG-QRS interval when the conduction time to the circuit is long. The postpacing interval, however, always exceeds the tachycardia cycle length. When conduction in the circuit slows during pacing, the S-QRS and postpacing intervals increase and the slowest stimulus train most closely reflects conduction times during tachycardia. Endocardial catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation were performed during 31 monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in 15 patients with drug refractory ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. During ventricular tachycardia, trains of electrical stimuli or scanning single stimuli were evaluated before application of radiofrequency current at the same site. Radiofrequency current terminated ventricular tachycardia at 24 of 241 sites (10%) in 12 of 15 patients (80%). Ventricular tachycardia termination occurred more frequently at sites with entrainment with concealed fusion (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 8.3), a postpacing interval approximating the ventricular tachycardia cycle length (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.6 to 12.9) and an S-QRS interval during entrainment of more than 60 milliseconds and less than 70% of the ventricular tachycardia cycle length (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 17.1). Ventricular tachycardia termination was also predicted by the presence of isolated diastolic potentials or continuous electrical activity (odds ratio, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.8 to 15.5), but these electrograms were infrequent (8% of all sites). Combinations of entrainment with concealed fusion, postpacing interval, S-QRS intervals, and isolated diastolic potentials or continuous electrical activity predicted a more than 35% incidence of ventricular tachycardia termination during radiofrequency current application versus a 4% incidence when none suggested that the site was in the reentry circuit. Analysis of the postpacing interval and S-QRS interval suggested that 25% of the sites with entrainment with concealed fusion were in bystander areas not within the reentry circuit. At restudy 5 to 7 days later, 6 patients had no monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible, and inducible ventricular tachycardias were modified in 4 patients. None of these 10 patients have suffered arrhythmia recurrences during a follow-up of 316 +/- 199 days, although 4 continue to receive previously ineffective medications. CONCLUSIONS: Regions giving rise to reentry after myocardial infarction are complex and can include bystander areas, slow conduction zones, and isthmuses for impulse propagation at which radiofrequency current lesions can interrupt reentry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zipes, D. P., Camm, A. J., Borggrefe, M., Buxton, A. E., Chaitman, B., Fromer, M., Gregoratos, G., Klein, G., Moss, A. J., Myerburg, R. J., et al. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.178233 · Cited by 1,080
EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias
Aliot, E. M., Stevenson, W. G., Almendral-Garrote, J. M., Bogun, F., Calkins, C. H., Delacretaz, E., Della Bella, P., Hindricks, G., Jaïs, P., Josephson, M. E., et al. (2009) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030 · Cited by 770
Self-citationOlgin, J. E., Kalman, J. M., Fitzpatrick, A. P., & Lesh, M. D. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.92.7.1839 · Cited by 500
Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia
Stevenson, W. G., & Soejima, K. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.655720 · Cited by 299
Self-citationEpstein, A. E., Miles, W. M., Benditt, D. G., Camm, A. J., Darling, E. J., Friedman, P. L., Garson, A., Harvey, J. C., Kidwell, G. A., Klein, G. J., et al. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.5.1147 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevenson, W. G., Khan, H., Sager, P., Saxon, L. A., Middlekauff, H. R., Natterson, P. D., & Wiener, I.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1647-1670
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2066742771
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1647
- The paper
- Stevenson, W. G., Khan, H., Sager, P., Saxon, L. A., Middlekauff, H. R., Natterson, P. D., & Wiener, I. (1993). Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1647
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.