Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Previous Angina Alters In-Hospital Outcome in TIMI 4: A Clinical Correlate to Preconditioning?

Kloner, Robert A., Shook, Thomas, Przyklenk, Karin, Davis, Vicki G., Junio, Lucille, Matthews, Ray V., Burstein, Steven, Gibson, C. Michael, Poole, W. Kenneth, Cannon, Christopher P., McCabe, Carolyn H., Braunwald, Eugene·1995·Circulation

Abstract

Background Ischemic preconditioning has been shown to reduce myocardial infarct size in experimental models, but its role in patients remains unclear. Angina before myocardial infarction reflects brief episodes of ischemia and may be a marker of preconditioning. As part of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 4 study, we performed an analysis on the effect of a history of previous angina on in-hospital outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Patients eligible for thrombolytic therapy were enrolled into the study. Data were collected from case report forms regarding previous history of angina, in-hospital outcome and 6-week follow-up. Two hundred eighteen patients had a history of previous angina at any time before acute myocardial infarction, and 198 patients did not have previous angina. Patients with any previous history of angina were less likely than with those without angina to experience in-hospital death (3% versus 8%) ( P =.03), severe congestive heart failure (CHF) or shock (1% versus 7%, P =.006), or the combined end point of in-hospital death, severe CHF, or shock (4% versus 12%, P =.004). Moreover, patients with any history of angina were more likely to have a smaller creatine kinase (CK)-determined infarct size (119 versus 154 CK integrated units; P =.01) and were less likely to have Q waves on their ECG (57% versus 69%; P =.01). In the subset of patients who experienced angina within the 48 hours before infarction (compared with those who did not), there was a trend toward less likely in-hospital death (3% versus 6%; P =.09), a lower incidence of severe CHF or shock (1% versus 6% P =.008), a lower combined end point of death, CHF, or shock (3% versus 10%; P =.006), smaller infarct size assessed by CK (115 versus 151 CK units; P =.03), and a trend toward fewer Q-wave infarcts. However, patients with a history of previous angina did have a trend toward more recurrent ischemic pain. Of importance is that the beneficial in-hospital effects of previous angina were not dependent on angiographically visible coronary collaterals. Conclusions Previous angina confers a beneficial effect on in-hospital outcome after acute myocardial infarction. The reasons for this benefit are uncertain, but one potential mechanism for this observation may be ischemic preconditioning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.91.1.37

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Kloner, R. A., Shook, T., Przyklenk, K., Davis, V. G., Junio, L., Matthews, R. V., Burstein, S., Gibson, C. M., Poole, W. K., Cannon, C. P., McCabe, C. H., & Braunwald, E.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1995-01
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
37-45
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2088043482
Cited by
528
References
0
FWCI
38.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Previous Angina Alters In-Hospital Outcome in TIMI 4: A Clinical Correlate to Preconditioning? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.91.1.37
The paper
Kloner, R. A., Shook, T., Przyklenk, K., Davis, V. G., Junio, L., Matthews, R. V., Burstein, S., Gibson, C. M., Poole, W. K., Cannon, C. P., McCabe, C. H., & Braunwald, E. (1995). Previous Angina Alters In-Hospital Outcome in TIMI 4: A Clinical Correlate to Preconditioning? Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.1.37

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.