The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis
Abstract
Background Vascular interventions that maximize initial lumen diameter provoke extensive neointimal hyperplasia but minimize its effects, causing long-term lumen size to be greater. Nevertheless, interventions such as endovascular stents, which increase lumen size above that achieved with balloon angioplasty, are subject to frequent thrombosis and restenosis. It has been unclear whether the response to stent-induced injury is determined solely by the degree of stent-induced arterial expansion or whether the geometric configuration of the stent or the material left in contact with the vessel wall also contribute. Methods and Results We examined the vascular response to steel stents deployed in denuded rabbit iliac arteries for 14 days. In one set of experiments, the effects of stent configuration were examined, holding diameter, mass, surface area, and stent surface material constant. In another set, stent surface material was changed, with mass, configuration, and diameter unaltered. Changing stent configuration to reduce strut-strut intersections by 29% without affecting mass or surface area reduced vascular injury by 42%, thrombosis by 69%, and neointimal hyperplasia by 38%. Monocyte adhesion to stented arteries correlated linearly with vascular trauma and neointimal hyperplasia ( r =.96, P <.01 for each). When the stainless steel surface was coated with an inert polymer material, vascular injury and neointimal hyperplasia were unchanged, but thrombosis was eliminated. Conclusions Surface material and geometric configuration of stents may be more important than postplacement diameter in determining neointimal hyperplasia and thrombosis. Alterations in configuration affect vascular injury and neointimal hyperplasia, while surface material plays a greater role in thrombosis. Monocytes may be important modulators of stent-induced intimal thickening. Clinical confirmation of these findings may alter coronary stent deployment techniques and future stent designs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kastrati, A., Mehilli, J., Dirschinger, J., Dotzer, F., Schühlen, H., Neumann, F.-J., Fleckenstein, M., Pfafferott, C., Seyfarth, M., & Schömig, A. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.23.2816 · Cited by 938
Yakacki, C. M., Shandas, R., Lanning, C., Rech, B., Eckstein, A., & Gall, K. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.030 · Cited by 618
Coronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies
Lowe, H. C., Oesterle, S. N., & Khachigian, L. M. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01742-9 · Cited by 414
Danenberg, H. D., Golomb, G., Groothuis, A., Gao, J., Epstein, H., Swaminathan, R. V., Seifert, P., & Edelman, E. R. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000097002.69209.cd · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, C., & Edelman, E. R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1995-06-15
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2995-3001
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1976855765
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.91.12.2995
- The paper
- Rogers, C., & Edelman, E. R. (1995). Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and Thrombosis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.12.2995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.