The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RR Variability in Healthy, Middle-Aged Persons Compared With Patients With Chronic Coronary Heart Disease or Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Background The purpose of this investigation was to establish normal values of RR variability for middle-aged persons and compare them with values found in patients early and late after myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that presence or absence of coronary heart disease, age, and sex (in this order of importance) are all correlated with RR variability. Methods and Results To determine normal values for RR variability in middle-aged persons, we recruited a sample of 274 healthy persons 40 to 69 years old. To determine the effect of acute myocardial infarction RR variability, we compared measurements of RR variability made 2 weeks after myocardial infarction (n=684) with measurements made on age- and sex-matched middle-aged subjects with no history of cardiovascular disease (n=274). To determine the extent of recovery of RR variability after myocardial infarction, we compared measurements of RR variability made in the group of healthy middle-aged persons with measurements made in 278 patients studied 1 year after myocardial infarction. We performed power spectral analyses on continuous 24-hour ECG recordings to quantify total power, ultralow-frequency (ULF) power, very-low-frequency (VLF) power, low-frequency (LF) power, high-frequency (HF) power, and the ratio of LF to HF (LF/HF) power. Time-domain measures also were calculated. All measures of RR variability were significantly and substantially lower in patients with chronic or subacute coronary heart disease than in healthy subjects. The difference from normal values was much greater 2 weeks after myocardial infarction than 1 year after infarction, but the fractional distribution of total power into its four component bands was similar for the three groups. In healthy subjects, ULF power did not change significantly with age; VLF, LF, and HF power decreased significantly as age increased. Patients with chronic coronary heart disease showed little relation between power spectral measures of RR variability and age. Patients with a recent myocardial infarction showed a strong inverse relation between VLF, LF, and HF power and age and a weak inverse relation between ULF power and age. ULF power best separates the healthy group from either of the two coronary heart disease groups. Differences in RR variability between men and women were small and inconsistent among the three groups. Conclusions All measures of RR variability were significantly and substantially higher in healthy subjects than in patients with chronic or subacute coronary heart disease. The difference between healthy middle-aged persons and those with coronary heart disease was much greater 2 weeks after myocardial infarction than 1 year after infarction, but the fractional distribution of total power into its four component bands was similar for the healthy group and the two coronary heart disease groups. Values of RR variability previously reported to predict death in patients with known chronic coronary heart disease are rarely (≈1%) found in healthy middle-aged individuals. Thus, when measures of RR variability are used to screen groups of middle-aged persons to identify individuals who have substantial risk of coronary deaths or arrhythmic events, misclassification of healthy middle-aged persons should be rare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
Walker, E. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488486 · Cited by 8,538
The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments
Fleiss, J. L. (1999) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118032923 · Cited by 4,819
Self-citationPagani, M., Lombardi, F., Guzzetti, S., Rimoldi, O., Furlan, R., Pizzinelli, P., Sandrone, G., Malfatto, G., Dell'Orto, S., & Piccaluga, E. (1986) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.59.2.178 · Cited by 4,130
Kleiger, R. E., Miller, J. P., Bigger, J. T., & Moss, A. J. (1987) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(87)90795-8 · Cited by 3,995
Self-citationFrequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction
Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Steinman, R. C., Rolnitzky, L. M., Kleiger, R. E., & Rottman, J. N. (1992) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.85.1.164 · Cited by 1,712
Self-citationRisk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial Infarction
The Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198308113090602 · Cited by 1,602
Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Kleiger, R., Miller, J. P., & Rolnitzky, L. M. (1984) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.69.2.250 · Cited by 1,286
Self-citationRespiratory sinus arrhythmia: noninvasive measure of parasympathetic cardiac control
Katona, P. G., & Jih, F. (1975) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1975.39.5.801 · Cited by 792
Farrell, T. G., Bashir, Y., Cripps, T., Malik, M., Poloniecki, J., Bennett, E. D., Ward, D. E., & Camm, A. J. (1991) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(91)90791-7 · Cited by 731
Saul, J. P., Arai, Y., Berger, R. D., Lilly, L. S., Colucci, W. S., & Cohen, R. J. (1988) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)91172-1 · Cited by 706
Cited by
Heart Rate Variability: Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use
Electrophysiology, T. F. O. T. E. S. O. C. T. N. A. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.93.5.1043 · Cited by 17,159
An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms
Shaffer, F., & Ginsberg, J. P. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258 · Cited by 7,185
Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats
BERNTSON, G. G., THOMAS BIGGER, J., ECKBERG, D. L., GROSSMAN, P., KAUFMANN, P. G., MALIK, M., NAGARAJA, H. N., PORGES, S. W., SAUL, J. P., STONE, P. H., et al. (1997) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02140.x · Cited by 3,962
Umetani, K., Singer, D. H., McCraty, R., & Atkinson, M. (1998) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00554-8 · Cited by 1,145
Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: A meta-analysis
Koenig, J., & Thayer, J. F. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007 · Cited by 860
Metadata
- Authors
- Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Steinman, R. C., Rolnitzky, L. M., Schneider, W. J., & Stein, P. K.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1936-1943
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2065781997
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RR Variability in Healthy, Middle-Aged Persons Compared With Patients With Chronic Coronary Heart Disease or Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1936
- The paper
- Bigger, J. T., Fleiss, J. L., Steinman, R. C., Rolnitzky, L. M., Schneider, W. J., & Stein, P. K. (1995). RR Variability in Healthy, Middle-Aged Persons Compared With Patients With Chronic Coronary Heart Disease or Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.