The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Only Weakly Correlated With the Extent and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease
Abstract
Background Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA), measured with external vascular ultrasound, has been widely used in clinical trials as a surrogate marker for coronary atherosclerosis. Despite this, the degree of correlation between carotid IMT and the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not known. Methods and Results Common carotid IMT was measured by ultrasound in 350 consecutive subjects of age 60±10 years (range, 30 to 85 years) on the day of coronary angiography. Carotid mean IMT was 0.83±0.20 mm (range, 0.43 to 1.80 mm), and maximum IMT was 1.04±0.27 mm (range, 0.49 to 2.19 mm). Coronary angiograms were analyzed by independent observers for disease severity (number of vessels with ≥70% stenosis), extent score, and a modified Gensini score. Mean carotid IMT was weakly but significantly correlated with CAD severity ( r =.26), extent ( r =.23), and modified Gensini score ( r =.29, P <.0001 for all correlations). Carotid IMT was not clinically useful, however, because it was not specific or sensitive enough to identify patients with or without significant CAD. Increasing age, male sex, and presence of diabetes were all associated with a significantly ( P <.01) higher CAD score than the average for any level of carotid IMT, suggesting differential effects of these traditional risk factors on the coronary and common carotid arteries. Conclusions Although carotid IMT is significantly correlated with extent and severity of CAD, the relationship is weak. This relatively poor correlation ( r 2 <.10) should be considered in the interpretation of clinical trials that use carotid IMT as a surrogate end point for coronary atherosclerosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging.
Pignoli, P., Tremoli, E., Poli, A., Oreste, P., & Paoletti, R. (1986) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1399 · Cited by 2,404
Cited by
Chambless, L. E., Heiss, G., Folsom, A. R., Rosamond, W., Szklo, M., Sharrett, A. R., & Clegg, L. X. (1997) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009302 · Cited by 1,990
Wood, D., De Backer, G., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Mancia, G., & Pyörälä, K. (1998) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/s0021-9150(98)90209-x · Cited by 1,255
Second Joint Task Force of European (1998) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.1998.1243 · Cited by 1,131
Lakatta, E. G. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000048894.99865.02 · Cited by 1,084
Carotid Plaque Area: A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy
Spence, J. D., Eliasziw, M., DiCicco, M., Hackam, D. G., Galil, R., & Lohmann, T. (2002) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000042207.16156.b9 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, M. R., Nakagomi, A., Keech, A., Robinson, J., McCredie, R., Bailey, B. P., Freedman, S. B., & Celermajer, D. S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1995-10-15
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2127-2134
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2075063725
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Only Weakly Correlated With the Extent and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.92.8.2127
- The paper
- Adams, M. R., Nakagomi, A., Keech, A., Robinson, J., McCredie, R., Bailey, B. P., Freedman, S. B., & Celermajer, D. S. (1995). Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Is Only Weakly Correlated With the Extent and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.8.2127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.