The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secular Trends in Long-term Sustained Hypertension, Long-term Treatment, and Cardiovascular Mortality: The Framingham Heart Study 1950 to 1990
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality result from the chronic processes involved in hypertension. However, long-term sustained (LTS) hypertension has received little attention. Methods and Results Trends in the prevalence of LTS hypertension and its treatment were assessed in 1950, 1960, and 1970 among three cohorts of men and women in the Framingham Heart Study (Mantel-Haenszel test). Cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality were compared between patients with LTS hypertension with and without long-term treatment by use of the χ 2 test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate 10-year risk of death as a function of risk factor levels and treatment. Prevalence of LTS hypertension rose from 138 to 208 per 1000 between the 1950 and 1970 male cohorts ( P <.01), while prevalence fell from 253 to 198 per 1000 between the female cohorts ( P <.02). Long-term treatment increased 51% between the male cohorts and 45% between the female cohorts (both P <.001). While CVD incidence was similar (26% versus 25%), all-cause mortality was significantly lower among men with long-term treatment (31% versus 43%; P <.05), and CVD mortality was less than half (13% versus 28%; P <.01). Among treated women, all-cause mortality was 21% (versus 34%; P <.01), and CVD mortality was 9% (versus 19%; P <.01). Ten-year risk of CVD death for patients with LTS hypertension with long-term treatment compared with those without was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60). Conclusions This investigation of LTS hypertension, its treatment, and its sequelae in a free-living general population confirms the reduction in CVD mortality demonstrated in more short-term clinical trials of hypertension therapy in select patient groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
(2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,655
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 · Cited by 10,286
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001940 · Cited by 2,885
Is Pulse Pressure Useful in Predicting Risk for Coronary Heart Disease?: The Framingham Heart Study
Franklin, S. S., Khan, S. A., Wong, N. D., Larson, M. G., & Levy, D. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.4.354 · Cited by 1,759
Metadata
- Authors
- Sytkowski, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., & Kannel, W. B.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1996-02-15
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 697-703
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2047872109
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secular Trends in Long-term Sustained Hypertension, Long-term Treatment, and Cardiovascular Mortality: The Framingham Heart Study 1950 to 1990. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.4.697
- The paper
- Sytkowski, P. A., D’Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., & Kannel, W. B. (1996). Secular Trends in Long-term Sustained Hypertension, Long-term Treatment, and Cardiovascular Mortality: The Framingham Heart Study 1950 to 1990. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.4.697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.