Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 889

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Mintz, Gary S., Popma, Jeffrey J., Pichard, Augusto D., Kent, Kenneth M., Satler, Lowell F., Chiu Wong, S., Hong, Mun K., Kovach, Julie A., Leon, Martin B.·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Restenosis occurs after 30% to 50% of transcatheter coronary procedures; however, the natural history and pathophysiology of restenosis are still incompletely understood. Methods and Results Serial (postintervention and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound imaging was used to study 212 native coronary lesions in 209 patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, directional coronary atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, or excimer laser angioplasty. The external elastic membrane (EEM) and lumen cross-sectional areas (CSA) were measured; plaque plus media (P+M) CSA was calculated as EEM minus lumen CSA. The anatomic slice selected for serial analysis had an axial location within the target lesion at the smallest follow-up lumen CSA. At follow-up, 73% of the decrease in lumen (from 6.6±2.5 to 4.0±3.7 mm 2 , P <.0001) was due to a decrease in EEM (from 20.1±6.4 to 18.2±6.4 mm 2 , P <.0001); 27% was due to an increase in P+M (from 13.5±5.5 to 14.2±5.4 mm 2 , P <.0001). ΔLumen CSA correlated more strongly with ΔEEM CSA ( r =.751, P <.0001) than with ΔP+M CSA ( r =.284, P <.0001). ΔEEM was bidirectional; 47 lesions (22%) showed an increase in EEM. Despite a greater increase in P+M (1.5±2.5 versus 0.5±2.0 mm 2 , P =.0009), lesions exhibiting an increase in EEM had (1) no change in lumen (−0.1±3.3 versus 3.6±2.3 mm 2 , P <.0001), (2) a reduced restenosis rate (26% versus 62%, P <.0001), and (3) a 49% frequency of late lumen gain (versus 1%, P <.0001) compared with lesions with no increase in EEM. Conclusions Restenosis appears to be determined primarily by the direction and magnitude of vessel wall remodeling (ΔEEM). An increase in EEM is adaptive, whereas a decrease in EEM contributes to restenosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.1.35

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 889

Metadata

Authors
Mintz, G. S., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Kent, K. M., Satler, L. F., Chiu Wong, S., Hong, M. K., Kovach, J. A., & Leon, M. B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-07
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
35-43
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2066387850
Cited by
889
References
1
FWCI
92.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.1.35
The paper
Mintz, G. S., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Kent, K. M., Satler, L. F., Chiu Wong, S., Hong, M. K., Kovach, J. A., & Leon, M. B. (1996). Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.1.35

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.