The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Activation and Entrainment Mapping Defines the Tricuspid Annulus as the Anterior Barrier in Typical Atrial Flutter
Abstract
Background The importance of anatomic barriers in the atrial flutter reentry circuit has been well demonstrated in canine models. It has been shown previously that the crista terminalis and its continuation as the eustachian ridge form a posterior barrier. In this study we tested the hypothesis that the tricuspid annulus forms the continuous anterior barrier to the flutter circuit. Methods and Results Thirteen patients with typical atrial flutter were studied. A 20-pole halo catheter was situated around the tricuspid annulus. A mapping catheter was used for activation and entrainment mapping from seven sequential sites around the tricuspid annulus and from three additional sites including the tip of the right atrial appendage, at the fossa ovalis, and in the distal coronary sinus. Sites were considered to be within the circuit when the postpacing interval minus the flutter cycle length and the stimulus time minus the activation time were ≤10 ms; sites were considered to be outside the circuit when these intervals were >10 ms. All seven annular sites were within the circuit; activation occurred sequentially around the annulus and accounted for 100% of the flutter cycle length. The fossa ovalis, the distal coronary sinus, and the right atrial appendage were outside the circuit. Conclusions Closely spaced sites around the tricuspid annulus are activated sequentially, and are all within the flutter circuit according to entrainment criteria. This demonstrates that the tricuspid annulus constitutes a continuous anterior barrier constraining the reentrant wave front of human counterclockwise atrial flutter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon Monoxide: Endogenous Production, Physiological Functions, and Pharmacological Applications
Wu, L., & Wang, R. (2005) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.57.4.3 · Cited by 962
Saoudi, N., Cosío, F., Waldo, A., Chen, S. A., Iesaka, Y., Lesh, M., Saksena, S., Salerno, J., & Schoels, W. (2001) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1053/euhj.2001.2658 · Cited by 464
Natale, A., Newby, K. H., Pisanó, E., Leonelli, F., Fanelli, R., Potenza, D., Beheiry, S., & Tomassoni, G. (2000) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00635-5 · Cited by 414
Collins, K. K., Love, B. A., Walsh, E. P., Saul, J. P., Epstein, M. R., & Triedman, J. K. (2000) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01132-2 · Cited by 194
Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art
Lee, G., Sanders, P., & Kalman, J. M. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61463-9 · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalman, J. M., Olgin, J. E., Saxon, L. A., Fisher, W. G., Lee, R. J., & Lesh, M. D.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 398-406
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1974836333
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activation and Entrainment Mapping Defines the Tricuspid Annulus as the Anterior Barrier in Typical Atrial Flutter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.3.398
- The paper
- Kalman, J. M., Olgin, J. E., Saxon, L. A., Fisher, W. G., Lee, R. J., & Lesh, M. D. (1996). Activation and Entrainment Mapping Defines the Tricuspid Annulus as the Anterior Barrier in Typical Atrial Flutter. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.3.398
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.