Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Hoffmann, Rainer, Mintz, Gary S., Dussaillant, Gaston R., Popma, Jeffrey J., Pichard, Augusto D., Satler, Lowell F., Kent, Kenneth M., Griffin, Jennifer, Leon, Martin B.·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Studies have suggested that restenosis within Palmaz-Schatz stents results from neointimal hyperplasia or chronic stent recoil and occurs more frequently at the articulation. Methods and Results Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed after intervention and at follow-up in 142 stents in 115 lesions. IVUS measurements (external elastic membrane [EEM], stent, and lumen cross-sectional areas [CSAs] and diameters) were performed, and plaque CSA (EEM lumen in reference segments and stent lumen in stented segments), late lumen loss (Δlumen), remodeling (ΔEEM in reference segments and Δstent in stented segments), and tissue growth (Δplaque) were calculated. After intervention, the lumen tended to be smallest at the articulation because of tissue prolapse. At follow-up, tissue growth was uniformly distributed throughout the stent; the tendency for greater neointimal tissue accumulation at the central articulation reached statistical significance only when normalized for the smaller postintervention lumen CSA. In stented segments, late lumen area loss correlated strongly with tissue growth but only weakly with remodeling. Stents affected adjacent vessel segments; remodeling progressively increased and tissue growth progressively decreased at distances from the edge of the stent. These findings were similar in native arteries and saphenous vein grafts and in lesions treated with one or two stents. There was no difference in the postintervention or follow-up lumen (at the junction of the two stents) when overlapped were compared with nonoverlapped stents. Conclusions Late lumen loss and in-stent restenosis were the result of neointimal tissue proliferation, which tended to be uniformly distributed over the length of the stent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1247

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,247

Metadata

Authors
Hoffmann, R., Mintz, G. S., Dussaillant, G. R., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Satler, L. F., Kent, K. M., Griffin, J., & Leon, M. B.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-09-15
Volume
94
Issue
6
Pages
1247-1254
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2076552301
Cited by
1,247
References
0
FWCI
71.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1247
The paper
Hoffmann, R., Mintz, G. S., Dussaillant, G. R., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Satler, L. F., Kent, K. M., Griffin, J., & Leon, M. B. (1996). Patterns and Mechanisms of In-Stent Restenosis: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.6.1247

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.