Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regional Differences in Electrophysiological Properties of Epicardium, Midmyocardium, and Endocardium: In Vitro and In Vivo Correlations

Anyukhovsky, Evgeny P., Sosunov, Eugene A., Rosen, Michael R.·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Microelectrode studies have described a population of cells within the midmyocardium (M cells) displaying a steep rate dependence of action potential duration (APD) and high V̇max compared with endocardial (Endo) and epicardial (Epi) cells. Methods and Results We studied repolarization in different myocardial layers in vitro and in situ. In addition to confirming the results of earlier studies, we found that after abrupt lengthening of the cycle length (CL), APDs in M cells reached a new steady state faster than in Epi or Endo cells: the time to achieve 90% of the difference in APD (t 90) was 13.3±0.7 minutes in Endo cells, 12.8±1.1 minutes in Epi cells, and 2.6±0.4 minutes in M cells (P<.05 compared with Epi or Endo) when CL changed from 400 to 1000 ms. In situ, we registered activation-recovery intervals (ARIs) in bipolar electrograms obtained from different myocardial layers in conditions of AV block and His-bundle pacing. At all CLs from 300 to 2000 ms, ARIs were equal in all myocardial layers from Epi to Endo cells. Steady-state ARIs coincided with APD of M cells registered in vitro in the physiological range of CL from 300 to 700 ms. When CL was changed from 300 to 1000 ms, the ARI followed the rapid time course typical of M cells (t 90=2.6±0.5, 2.2±0.4, 2.5±0.4, 2.6±0.5, and 2.3±0.4 minutes for Epi; 3-, 5-, and 7-mm sub-Epi; and Endo cells, respectively). Conclusions In contrast to in vitro results, there is no significant difference in repolarization among myocardial layers in the intact normal canine heart.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1981

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Metadata

Authors
Anyukhovsky, E. P., Sosunov, E. A., & Rosen, M. R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-10-15
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
1981-1988
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2049374127
Cited by
254
References
15
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional Differences in Electrophysiological Properties of Epicardium, Midmyocardium, and Endocardium: In Vitro and In Vivo Correlations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1981
The paper
Anyukhovsky, E. P., Sosunov, E. A., & Rosen, M. R. (1996). Regional Differences in Electrophysiological Properties of Epicardium, Midmyocardium, and Endocardium: In Vitro and In Vivo Correlations. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1981

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.